{"id":152964,"date":"2018-02-15T04:00:19","date_gmt":"2018-02-15T09:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=152964"},"modified":"2018-02-15T04:00:19","modified_gmt":"2018-02-15T09:00:19","slug":"after-undersea-naming-protest-ph-still-trusts-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/15\/after-undersea-naming-protest-ph-still-trusts-china\/","title":{"rendered":"After undersea naming protest, PH still trusts China"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_151339\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-151339\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/010918a-roque-press-briefing-1350x759.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-151339\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/010918a-roque-press-briefing-1350x759.jpg\" alt=\"(PCOO Photo)\" width=\"1350\" height=\"759\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/010918a-roque-press-briefing-1350x759.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/010918a-roque-press-briefing-1350x759-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/010918a-roque-press-briefing-1350x759-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/010918a-roque-press-briefing-1350x759-1024x576.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-151339\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Presidential Spokesman Harry Roque, Jr. (PCOO Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The Philippine government maintains its trust in China even after protesting its move to name undersea features in the Philippine Rise formerly known as Benham Rise.<\/p>\n<p>Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, Jr. in a press briefing on Thursday said that just because the Chinese government named these undersea features, it does not mean that they are claiming it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are not attributing any bad faith to China,\u201d he said. He then added, \u201cNaming doesn&#8217;t mean they are claiming.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Roque just said that the government hopes that China will \u2018understand\u2019 the protest to the naming, since the Philippines has the sovereign rights over the Philippine Rise.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are just saying, respect us too, that we will give Philippine names to them,&#8221; the spokesman said.<\/p>\n<p>On February 14, the Philippines rejected the Chinese names approved by the International Hydrographic Organization-Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans.<\/p>\n<p>(Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/14\/palace-on-ph-rise-chinese-names-we-object\/\">Palace on PH Rise Chinese names: We object<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe object and do not recognize the Chinese names given to some undersea features in the Philippine Rise,\u201d Roque said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>He also cited that the Philippines also rejected the name given by the Americans, since Benham Rise was named after American Admiral Andrew Benham.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Ang<\/em> stand<em> natin, bahala kayo ano ang ibigay niyo d\u2019yan, basta kami magtatalaga kami ng Pilipinong pangalan gaya ng ginawa na naming sa pagbalewala sa dun sa pangalang binigay ng <\/em>mga Amerikano sa lugar na \u2018yan, ngayong Philippine Rise <em>na<\/em> (Our stand is that it is up to you what name to give, but for us we will give it Philippine names which we already did when we ignored the American name given to it, now that we call it as Philippine Rise),\u201d Roque stated.<\/p>\n<p>He then added that in a meeting in Malaca\u00f1ang earlier, some name suggestions were already brought up.<\/p>\n<p>The Duterte administration has been consistent in maintaining its ties with China, saying in previous statements that it relies on good faith when it came to the developments in the disputed areas in the West Philippine Sea.<\/p>\n<p>Roque was asked if the recent protest will have ill effects with the relationship of the countries, to which he said that it will not as \u201cthere is no controversy in the Philippine Rise.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, the Chinese government submitted the names Jinghao Seamount (found at about 70 nautical miles east of Cagayan province), Tianbao Seamount (found at about 70 nautical miles east of Cagayan province), Haidonquing Seamount (found at about 190 nautical miles east of Cagayan province), Cuiqiao Hill, and Jujiu Seamount.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAll are within 200 nautical miles of the east coast of Luzon, not in the region of the extended continental shelf, but well within the \u2018legal\u2019 continental shelf,\u201d Jay Batongbacal, a maritime law expert said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Philippine government maintains its trust in China even after protesting its move to name undersea features in the Philippine &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":151339,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[5450,420,15350,46590,19410],"class_list":["post-152964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-benham-rise","tag-china","tag-harry-roque-jr","tag-international-hydrographic-organization-intergovernmental-oceanographic-commission-general-bathymetric-chart-of-the-oceans","tag-philippine-rise","mauthors-bea-kirstein-t-manalaysay","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152964\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/151339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}