{"id":152796,"date":"2018-02-14T02:06:43","date_gmt":"2018-02-14T07:06:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=152796"},"modified":"2018-02-14T02:06:43","modified_gmt":"2018-02-14T07:06:43","slug":"trump-hamstrings-u-s-nafta-negotiators-says-canadas-chief-negotiator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/14\/trump-hamstrings-u-s-nafta-negotiators-says-canadas-chief-negotiator\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump hamstrings U.S. NAFTA negotiators, says Canada&#8217;s chief negotiator"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_119264\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-119264\" style=\"width: 1024px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12174427265_6ae8238792_o.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-119264\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12174427265_6ae8238792_o.jpg\" alt=\"FILE: Tuesday's hard-hitting and sobering update from Steve Verheul came on the same day that U.S. trade czar Robert Lighthizer took another shot at Canada by suggesting more progress on the continental trade pact was being made with Mexico. (Photo by Jadwiga Winiarska via Polish Institute of International Affairs\/Flickr)\" width=\"1024\" height=\"658\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12174427265_6ae8238792_o.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12174427265_6ae8238792_o-300x193.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/12174427265_6ae8238792_o-768x494.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-119264\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Tuesday&#8217;s hard-hitting and sobering update from Steve Verheul came on the same day that U.S. trade czar Robert Lighthizer took another shot at Canada by suggesting more progress on the continental trade pact was being made with Mexico. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/pism_thinkthank_poland\/12174427265\/in\/photolist-p6Nssd-jxRyfN-jxQEAq-jxP85n-jxQ5tr-p6Pm6R-p6NqVf-p6Nqz5-p6N6mV-pogHPY-pmgf4o-pogHvG-DLKn9G-Ey1Xud-EJt3aX-DM5JRR-DM6dVX-Ey1EtQ-EaZqZX-DLKgmu-DM6n8i-rVBq9R-ueADpJ\">Photo <\/a>by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/\">Jadwiga Winiarska via Polish Institute of International Affairs\/Flickr<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA\u2014 The effort to rescue NAFTA has made limited progress because U.S. bargainers find themselves hamstrung by the Trump White House and the fact talks are taking place too quickly, Canada&#8217;s chief negotiator says.<\/p>\n<p>Tuesday&#8217;s hard-hitting and sobering update from Steve Verheul came on the same day that U.S. trade czar Robert Lighthizer took another shot at Canada by suggesting more progress on the continental trade pact was being made with Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>Verheul described the current NAFTA talks as the most unusual negotiation he&#8217;s ever been involved in.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey do not come to the table our counterparts with a lot of flexibility. This is being driven to a large extent from the top, from the administration, and there&#8217;s not a lot of flexibility,\u201d the veteran negotiator told the Canadian Global Affairs Institute.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. strategy is to strengthen its position by weakening Canada and Mexico a tactic that could end up having dire consequences for all three countries, Verheul said.<\/p>\n<p>President Donald Trump&#8217;s threat to trigger NAFTA&#8217;s six-month withdrawal notice remains a possibility and Canada is ready for any eventuality, he said.<\/p>\n<p>If it happens, Verheul said it might simply be a negotiating tactic.<\/p>\n<p>The normally reserved Verheul warned \u201cthe worst possible outcome\u201d would be for the United States to go it alone a scenario he warned would weaken North America, allowing other countries and regions to take easy advantage.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the U.S. is to go alone, not only would North American be weakened, but I think the U.S. would also be weakened economically.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canada is particularly concerned with a controversial U.S. Buy American proposal that would limit access to public contracts.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. has proposed limiting Canada and Mexico to one dollar of contracts for every dollar in contracts granted by Canada and Mexico to American companies, an idea Canada and Mexico alike have branded a non-starter.<\/p>\n<p>That \u201cis the worst offer ever made by the U.S. in any trade negotiation,\u201d Verheul said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c(It) would leave us in a position where the country of Bahrain would have far better access to U.S. procurement markets than Canada would, or that Mexico would, and we&#8217;ve clearly said this kind of offer is not possible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canada will stay at the negotiating table for as long as it takes, Verheul said, but it&#8217;s impossible to predict the next move of a notoriously unpredictable president.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. ambassador Kelly Craft said in a speech Tuesday night in Ottawa that Trump&#8217;s election victory was the result of him awakening sentiments percolating in America for some time that are shared by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to elevate working people.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe do not want to leave Canada behind. To the contrary, we want you to understand in clear terms, we want an updated NAFTA to stimulate North America to be more competitive in the global economy,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe wants really big trade.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But even though three chapters have been closed, Verheul said the pace has been \u201cfairly limited progress over all because there hasn&#8217;t been enough time between rounds to re-evaluate positions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe pace has been a bit too fast to do a lot of the kind of homework that needs to be done domestically to allow further progress to be made,\u201d Verheul said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat is a consequence of trying to move too quickly in a negotiation like this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The seventh round of NAFTA talks is set to begin later this month in Mexico City with substantial differences remaining on autos, a sunset clause and an investor-dispute resolution mechanism, and U.S. demands for greater market access to Canada&#8217;s protected dairy industry.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHeading into the next round, we will bring a lot of ideas to the table. We will be aiming to achieve real progress and we&#8217;re hoping the U.S. will bring a similar attitude to the table,\u201d said Verheul.<\/p>\n<p>He then added: \u201cWe&#8217;re somewhat more confident that Mexico will bring that attitude to the table.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canadian negotiators are headed to Mexico next week to have a strategy session with their counterparts ahead of the seventh round.<\/p>\n<p>The NAFTA renegotiation survived its sixth round of talks in Montreal last month, with Lighthizer saying enough progress was made to push forward despite American dissatisfaction with some Canadian proposals.<\/p>\n<p>Lighthizer also called Canada&#8217;s wide-ranging complaint to the World Trade Organization about American use of punitive sanctions a \u201cmassive attack\u201d against U.S. trading practices.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this week, Trump complained about Canadian trade practices and threatened an undefined international tax, reviving fears of new American import penalties a fear the White House has since played down.<\/p>\n<p>Canada has no position on that because it is not clear what Trump is talking about, Verheul said.<\/p>\n<p>A final eighth and final round is scheduled in Washington in late March or early April before presidential elections in Mexico and the U.S. congressional midterms.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA\u2014 The effort to rescue NAFTA has made limited progress because U.S. bargainers find themselves hamstrung by the Trump White &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":119264,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[19067,46593,46592],"class_list":["post-152796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","tag-nafta","tag-steve-verheul","tag-trump-hamstrings-u-s-nafta-negotiators","mauthors-mike-blanchfield","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152796"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152796\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/119264"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}