{"id":151360,"date":"2018-02-06T01:25:46","date_gmt":"2018-02-06T06:25:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=151360"},"modified":"2018-02-06T01:25:46","modified_gmt":"2018-02-06T06:25:46","slug":"trudeau-under-fire-for-saying-some-vets-want-more-than-government-can-afford","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/06\/trudeau-under-fire-for-saying-some-vets-want-more-than-government-can-afford\/","title":{"rendered":"Trudeau under fire for saying some vets want more than government can afford"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_151361\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-151361\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Justin-Trudeau.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-151361\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Justin-Trudeau.jpg\" alt=\"The federal Conservatives cited an itemized list of Liberal-approved expenditures to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Monday as they demanded he apologize for saying some veterans want more than the government can afford. (Photo: Justin Trudeau\/Facebook)\" width=\"960\" height=\"639\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Justin-Trudeau.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Justin-Trudeau-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Justin-Trudeau-768x511.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-151361\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The federal Conservatives cited an itemized list of Liberal-approved expenditures to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Monday as they demanded he apologize for saying some veterans want more than the government can afford. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JustinPJTrudeau\/photos\/a.101277015648.106166.21751825648\/10156420275455649\/?type=3&amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JustinPJTrudeau\/\">Justin Trudeau\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA \u2014 The federal Conservatives cited an itemized list of Liberal-approved expenditures to Prime Minister Justin\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0on Monday as they demanded he apologize for saying some veterans want more than the government can afford.<\/p>\n<p>Trudeau\u00a0made the comments during a townhall event in Edmonton last week, where a wounded veteran accused the prime minister of breaking a key promise from the last election.<\/p>\n<p>In August 2015,\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0said that if he was elected, veterans would no longer have to fight the government in court for fair and equitable compensation for injuries received while in uniform.<\/p>\n<p>The Liberals also promised to re-instate lifelong disability pensions for injured veterans, which were replaced by a lump-sum payment, rehabilitation programs and targeted-income support in 2006.<\/p>\n<p>But upon taking power, the Liberals continued to fight a lawsuit filed against the previous Conservative government by six injured veterans demanding the re-instatement of the old pensions.<\/p>\n<p>During question period in the House of Commons on Monday, Conservative leader Andrew Scheer questioned the Liberal government&#8217;s priorities as he detailed several other expenditures during\u00a0Trudeau&#8217;s watch.<\/p>\n<p>Included on the list: the $10-million settlement with Omar Khadr; $256-million for a China-led infrastructure bank; a $372-million loan to Bombardier and $200,000 for\u00a0Trudeau&#8217;s Christmas trip to the Aga Khan&#8217;s island in 2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo why does he say no to Canada&#8217;s veterans?\u201d Scheer said after demanding\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0apologize for his remarks last Thursday, which have since been viewed online thousands of times and stoked anger in the veterans&#8217; community.<\/p>\n<p>Trudeau\u00a0was seated at his desk as Scheer spoke, but it was Veterans Affairs Minister Seamus O&#8217;Regan who rose to answer the question by citing several recent initiatives introduced by the Liberals for veterans.<\/p>\n<p>Those included a new version of disability pensions that O&#8217;Regan unveiled in December, which the Liberals say will provide more compensation to the most severely injured veterans.<\/p>\n<p>Many injured veterans, however, including the six involved in the so-called Equitas lawsuit as well as one of Canada&#8217;s largest veterans&#8217; associations, say the new pensions still fall far short of what was available before 2006.<\/p>\n<p>During the event last week in Edmonton, retired corporal Brock Blaszczyk, who lost his left leg in Afghanistan in 2009, confronted\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0about the prime minister&#8217;s promise not to fight veterans in court.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhy are we still fighting against certain veterans&#8217; groups in court? Because they&#8217;re asking for more than we are able to give right now,\u201d\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0responded, prompting boos from some members of the audience.<\/p>\n<p>After quieting the crowd, the prime minister went on to defend the new system of providing compensation and support to veterans, which includes money for rehabilitation, job-training and caregiver support.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe cannot return to the amount of money that was given before without accounting for the money invested in services for veterans,\u201d\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd what I know from veterans I&#8217;ve spoken to is nobody wants after having served their country with valour and honour and sacrifice to have their government say: Here&#8217;s your cheque. Now don&#8217;t bother us anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA \u2014 The federal Conservatives cited an itemized list of Liberal-approved expenditures to Prime Minister Justin\u00a0Trudeau\u00a0on Monday as they demanded &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":151361,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[3070,2567],"class_list":["post-151360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-justin-trudeau","tag-veterans","mauthors-lee-berthiaume","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151360\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/151361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}