{"id":151269,"date":"2018-02-05T23:16:29","date_gmt":"2018-02-06T04:16:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=151269"},"modified":"2018-02-05T23:16:29","modified_gmt":"2018-02-06T04:16:29","slug":"ph-govt-says-new-charter-will-not-give-up-any-ph-territory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/02\/05\/ph-govt-says-new-charter-will-not-give-up-any-ph-territory\/","title":{"rendered":"PH gov\u2019t says new Charter will not give up any PH territory"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_143929\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-143929\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/joey1-1-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-143929\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/joey1-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"(PCOO Photo)\" width=\"1350\" height=\"900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/joey1-1-1.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/joey1-1-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/joey1-1-1-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/joey1-1-1-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-143929\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Presidential Spokesman Harry Roque (PCOO Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In response to former Senate President Aquilino Pimentel Jr., the Duterte administration stressed that it has no intentions of amending the Constitution affecting Philippine territory.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Palace has not made any pronouncement that the Charter should be redrafted in a manner that would give up any Philippine territory,\u201d Presidential Spokesman Harry Roque Jr. said on a February 5 press briefing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe language of the Constitution, be it \u201935, \u201973, and \u201987 provides for no definition of national territory. That\u2019s not one of the parts of the Constitution that the Palace seeks to amend or revise,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Roque made the statement after Pimentel\u2019s proposal of making Sabah the country\u2019s 13<sup>th<\/sup> federal state in a shift to a federal form of government.<\/p>\n<p>Pimentel proposed, \u201cEventually, once we have asserted our sovereignty and rights over Sabah, we should include Sabah. Not only Sabah, but also Scarborough, Benham Rise, and the Spratlys.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, the Malaysian government rejected Pimentel\u2019s proposal.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe government of Malaysia reiterates its position that Malaysia does not recognize and will not entertain any claims by any party on Sabah,\u201d Foreign Minister of Malaysia Datuk Seri Anifah Aman.<\/p>\n<p>The media asked the Presidential spokesman to comment, to which he replied, \u201cMy answer is there is a definition of Philippine territory in all our Constitutions. It includes territory by reason of historic title.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Philippines\u2019 claimed ownership of Sabah roots from the sultanate of Sulu who used to rule some parts of the land. Sabah was leased to the British North Borneo Co. But in 1963, the British government turned over Sabah to the Federation of Malaysia.<\/p>\n<p>The Malaysian government, however, insists that Sabah was not eased but ceded, and that the international community recognizes Sabah as part of its territory.<\/p>\n<p>Before assuming his Presidency, President Rodrigo Roa Duterte vowed to address the Philippines\u2019 claim on Sabah.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In response to former Senate President Aquilino Pimentel Jr., the Duterte administration stressed that it has no intentions of amending &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":143929,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[45952,5450,10488,9948,15350,851,14387,5488,1537,4842],"class_list":["post-151269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-aquilino-pimentel-jr","tag-benham-rise","tag-constitution","tag-federalism","tag-harry-roque-jr","tag-malaysia","tag-rodrigo-roa-duterte","tag-sabah","tag-scarborough","tag-spratlys","mauthors-bea-kirstein-t-manalaysay","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151269"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151269\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/143929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}