{"id":149715,"date":"2018-01-30T02:38:21","date_gmt":"2018-01-30T07:38:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=149715"},"modified":"2018-01-30T02:38:21","modified_gmt":"2018-01-30T07:38:21","slug":"new-russia-sanctions-kick-in-but-us-opts-to-punish-nobody","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/01\/30\/new-russia-sanctions-kick-in-but-us-opts-to-punish-nobody\/","title":{"rendered":"New Russia sanctions kick in, but US opts to punish nobody"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"FILE:<\/a>
Flag of Russia (Photo by Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has decided not to punish anybody for now under new sanctions retaliating for Russia’s election-meddling, the State Department said Monday, in a surprising move that fueled further questions about whether President Donald Trump is too soft on Moscow.<\/p>\n

The government had until Monday to take two steps under a law passed by Congress last year in the wake of the 2016 presidential campaign. The first required the U.S. to slap sanctions on anyone doing \u201csignificant\u201d business with people linked to Russia’s defence and intelligence agencies, using a blacklist the U.S. released in October. The second required the administration to publish a list of Russian \u201cpolitical figures and oligarchs\u201d who have grown rich under President Vladimir Putin.<\/p>\n

On the first item, the administration decided it didn’t need to penalize anyone, even though several countries have had multibillion-dollar arms deals with Russia in the works. State Department officials said the threat of sanctions had been deterrent enough, and that \u201csanctions on specific entities or individuals will not need to be imposed.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe estimate that foreign governments have abandoned planned or announced purchases of several billion dollars in Russian defence acquisitions,\u201d said State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert. She did not provide evidence or cite any examples.<\/p>\n

On the second item — the \u201cPutin list\u201d — the day came and went with no sign of if or when it would be released. The Treasury Department did not respond to several inquiries. In the past, the administration has breezed past several such deadlines, including the October deadline to produce a blacklist, only to follow through later after pressure from Congress mounted.<\/p>\n

By itself, being on the Putin list doesn’t trigger U.S. sanctions. Yet the list, being developed by the Treasury Department, has induced fear among rich Russians who are concerned that it could lead later to U.S. sanctions or to being informally blacklisted in the global financial system. It has triggered a fierce lobbying campaign, with Russia hawks in Congress pushing the administration to include certain names and lobbyists hired by Russian businessmen urging the administration to keep their clients off.<\/p>\n

Companies or foreign governments that had been doing business with blacklisted Russian entities had been given a three-month grace period to extricate themselves from transactions, starting in October when the blacklist was published and ending Monday. But only those engaged in \u201csignificant transactions\u201d are to be punished, and the United States has never defined that term or given a dollar figure. That ambiguity has made it impossible for the public to know exactly what is and isn’t permissible.<\/p>\n

Late last year, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said one reason the U.S. was proceeding cautiously was that major U.S. allies have much at stake. Turkey, a NATO ally, has a deal to buy the S-400, Russia’s most advanced air defence missile system. And key security partner Saudi Arabia recently struck an array of deals with Moscow, including contracts for weapons. It was unclear whether either country had since abandoned those deals to avoid running afoul of the U.S. sanctions.<\/p>\n

New York Rep. Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, lambasted the move to punish no one, saying he was \u201cfed up\u201d and that Trump’s administration had chosen to \u201clet Russia off the hook yet again.\u201d He dismissed the State Department’s claim that \u201cthe mere threat of sanctions\u201d would stop Moscow from further meddling in America’s elections.<\/p>\n

\u201cHow do you deter an attack that happened two years ago, and another that’s already underway?\u201d Engel said. \u201cIt just doesn’t make sense.\u201d<\/p>\n

——<\/p>\n

Associated Press writer Jill Colvin contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has decided not to punish anybody for now under new sanctions retaliating for Russia’s election-meddling, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":149586,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24157,16,17],"tags":[9869,1786,512,14328],"class_list":["post-149715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-american-news","category-news","category-news-w","tag-donald-trump","tag-election","tag-russia","tag-trump-administration","mauthors-josh-lederman","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149715\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/149586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}