{"id":147778,"date":"2018-01-21T06:17:45","date_gmt":"2018-01-21T11:17:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=147778"},"modified":"2018-01-21T06:17:45","modified_gmt":"2018-01-21T11:17:45","slug":"ex-navy-chief-clears-bong-go-anew-from-frigate-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/01\/21\/ex-navy-chief-clears-bong-go-anew-from-frigate-project\/","title":{"rendered":"Ex-Navy chief clears Bong Go anew from Frigate project"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"In<\/a>
FILE: Ronald Joseph Mercado\u00a0 (Photo<\/a>: PHILIPPINE NAVY\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0— Former Philippine Navy (PN) flag-officer-in-command, Vice Admiral Ronald Joseph Mercado, cleared Special Assistant to the President Christopher “Bong” Go anew saying the latter never paid any special attention or interest in the Navy’s PHP18-billion Frigate Acquisition Project (FAP).<\/p>\n

“Ilang beses kami na magkasama ni<\/em>\u00a0Secretary Bong Go,\u00a0ilang beses kaming mag kausap ah.\u00a0<\/em>In fact,\u00a0pag nag<\/em>-escort\u00a0ako kay<\/em>\u00a0President (Rodrigo Roa Duterte) aboard foreign navy ships\u00a0gaya nung sa<\/em>\u00a0China, Pakistan, Japan,\u00a0ni isang beses ‘di kami nag-usap tungkol sa<\/em>\u00a0Navy frigate project,” Mercado said in an interview with Radyo Pilipinas on Saturday.<\/p>\n

Mercado issued this clarification in wake of reports alleging that Go made an effort to intervene in the project.<\/p>\n

“Hindi niya ako tinanong, hindi niya nga kinukumusta yung nangyayari dun. Ganun ho din si<\/em>\u00a0President Rodrigo Roa Duterte,\u00a0hindi niya tinatanong, yun<\/em>\u00a0communications\u00a0ko tungkol sa<\/em>\u00a0frigate\u00a0lahat papunta lang sa<\/em>\u00a0GHQ (General Headquarters) and DND (Department of National Defense) So\u00a0basta<\/em>\u00a0on my side\u00a0kung may magtatanong, wala ho kaming diskusyon ni<\/em>\u00a0Secretary Bong Go\u00a0tungkol dun sa<\/em>\u00a0frigate,” the former Navy chief added.<\/p>\n

Also, the issues concerning the FAP were very technical and complex and it would have taken him nearly a day to explain it, should the official ask him about it, Mercado added.<\/p>\n

He also pointed out that all his statements are factual and not aimed at defending or clearing Go and Duterte.<\/p>\n

“Basta yung<\/em>\u00a0statement\u00a0ko lang, S<\/em>ir, eh factual and never\u00a0na<\/em>\u00a0kinausap nila ako tungkol sa<\/em>\u00a0frigate.\u00a0Basta<\/em>\u00a0on my side,\u00a0sa tagal ko naging<\/em>FOIC,\u00a0sa tagal naming nagkikita<\/em>\u00a0never\u00a0na tinanong ako<\/em>\u00a0or even\u00a0na kinamusta kung ano ang nangyayari sa<\/em>\u00a0frigate, in fact on Navy Day last year\u00a0dun namin ginanap sa<\/em>\u00a0Davao where I invited the President\u00a0kasama si<\/em>\u00a0Secretary Bong Go\u00a0sa<\/em>\u00a0Navy ship\u00a0namin na bago,<\/em>\u00a0BRP Davao Del Sur.\u00a0Doon din habang andun eh wala naman tinanong sila<\/em>\u00a0tungkol\u00a0sa<\/em>\u00a0frigate or even the other Navy project. So as far as I am concerned, people will ask me, they never intervened as far as\u00a0sa akin<\/em>\u00a0on any of the modernization project of the PN,\u00a0di lang yung<\/em>frigate,\u00a0maski nga yung ibang<\/em>\u00a0project\u00a0namin. Di sila nagtatanong<\/em>,” Mercado stressed.<\/p>\n

Earlier, the DND cleared Go of any interference in the FAP following reports claiming that the latter intervened with the project.<\/p>\n

“The President has already addressed the issue of the alleged ‘intervention’ of the SAP Christopher \u201cBong\u201d Go in the PN Frigate Acquisition Project,” DND Spokesperson Arsenio Andolong, quoting Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana, in a statement.<\/p>\n

“The Secretary of National Defense (Delfin Lorenzana) is confirming that no intervention or interference by Secretary Bong Go happened. The document that the SND alluded to have been given to him by Secretary Bong Go was handed to him at the Palace, so he assumed that it came from Secretary Go, the Special Assistant to the President and Chief of the Presidential Management Staff (PMS). It should be noted that one of the tasks of the PMS includes the official routing and endorsement of documents to government agencies concerned, for appropriate action,” he added.<\/p>\n

Andolong said the subject document originated from Hanwha, one of the proponents for the combat management system (CMS) who was post-qualified by the Philippine Navy for the FAP.<\/p>\n

“The SND forwarded it to then Flag-Officer-In-Command of the Philippine Navy (then Vice Admiral Ronald Joseph Mercado) for appropriate action, who, in turn, gave it to then Commodore (now Rear Admiral) Robert Empedrad, the Chairperson of the Frigate Project Management Team at the time. Admiral Empedrad wrote a reply to the document stating the preferred CMS of the Philippine Navy, subject to the terms and conditions of the contract,” he added.<\/p>\n

The DND spokesperson said there was neither hint nor guidance from the Palace or from Go to influence the implementation of the project.<\/p>\n

“There is a contract for the FAP which was crafted mainly by the Philippine Navy and it will be implemented strictly to the letter,” Andolong pointed out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u00a0— Former Philippine Navy (PN) flag-officer-in-command, Vice Admiral Ronald Joseph Mercado, cleared Special Assistant to the President Christopher “Bong” Go …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":127588,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[420,44158,667,2568,11004,14387,44157],"class_list":["post-147778","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-china","tag-cristopher-bong-go","tag-japan","tag-pakistan","tag-philippine-navy","tag-rodrigo-roa-duterte","tag-ronald-joseph-mercado","mauthors-priam-nepomuceno","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=147778"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147778\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/127588"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=147778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=147778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=147778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}