{"id":143421,"date":"2018-01-03T01:21:11","date_gmt":"2018-01-03T06:21:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=143421"},"modified":"2018-01-03T01:21:11","modified_gmt":"2018-01-03T06:21:11","slug":"trump-sounds-open-to-korea-dialogue-then-mocks-kim-jong-un","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2018\/01\/03\/trump-sounds-open-to-korea-dialogue-then-mocks-kim-jong-un\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump sounds open to Korea dialogue, then mocks Kim Jong Un"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"FILE:<\/a>
FILE: Donald Trump (Photo: Donald J. Trump\/Facebook)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 President Donald Trump sounded open Tuesday to the possibility of an inter-Korean dialogue after North Korean leader Kim Jong Un made a rare overture toward South Korea in a New Year’s address. But Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations insisted talks would not be meaningful unless the North was getting rid of its nuclear weapons, and Trump later boasted that his \u201cnuclear button\u201d is bigger and more powerful than Kim’s.<\/p>\n

In a morning tweet, Trump said the U.S.-led campaign of sanctions and other pressure were beginning to have a \u201cbig impact\u201d on North Korea. He referred to the recent, dramatic escape of at least two North Korean soldiers across the heavily militarized border into South Korea. He also alluded to Kim’s comments Monday that he was willing to send a delegation to the Winter Olympics, which will be hosted by South Korea next month.<\/p>\n

\u201cSoldiers are dangerously fleeing to South Korea. Rocket man now wants to talk to South Korea for first time. Perhaps that is good news, perhaps not – we will see!\u201d Trump said, using his derisive moniker for the young North Korean leader.<\/p>\n

In response to Kim’s overture, South Korea on Tuesday offered high-level talks on Jan. 9 at the shared border village of Panmunjom to discuss Olympic co-operation and how to improve overall ties.<\/p>\n

North Korea did not immediately react to the South’s proposal. If there are talks, they would be the first formal dialogue between the Koreas since December 2015. Relations have plunged as the North has accelerated its nuclear and ballistic missile development that now poses a direct threat to America, South Korea’s crucial ally.<\/p>\n

The U.S. administration, however, voiced suspicions that Kim was seeking to drive a wedge between Seoul and Washington. Pyongyang could view a closer relationship with Seoul has a way for reducing its growing international isolation and relief from sanctions that are starting to bite the North’s meagre economy.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe won’t take any of the talks seriously if they don’t do something to ban all nuclear weapons in North Korea,\u201d U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley told reporters at the United Nations. \u201cWe consider this to be a very reckless regime. We don’t think we need a Band-Aid, and we don’t think we need to smile and take a picture.\u201d<\/p>\n

In his New Year’s address, Kim repeated fiery nuclear threats against the United States. He said he has a \u201cnuclear button\u201d on his office desk and warned that \u201cthe whole territory of the U.S. is within the range of our nuclear strike.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump on Tuesday mocked the button assertion.<\/p>\n

\u201cWill someone from his depleted and\u00a0food<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!\u201d Trump wrote.<\/p>\n

Trump doesn’t actually have a physical nuclear button.<\/p>\n

The process for launching a nuclear strike is secret and complex, and involves the use of a nuclear \u201cfootball,\u201d which is carried by a rotating group of military officers everywhere the president goes and is equipped with communication tools and a book with prepared war plans.<\/p>\n

If the president were to order a strike, he would identify himself to military officials at the Pentagon with codes unique to him. Those codes are recorded on a card known as the \u201cbiscuit\u201d that is carried by the president at all times. He would then transmit the launch order to the Pentagon and Strategic Command.<\/p>\n

North Korea has been punished with unprecedented sanctions at the U.N. over its weapons programs, and Haley warned Tuesday of more measures if the North conducts another missile test.<\/p>\n

In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert did not express opposition Tuesday to South Korea holding talks with North Korea, but voiced deep skepticism about Kim’s intentions, saying he may be \u201ctrying to drive a wedge of some sort\u201d between the U.S. and its ally, which hosts 28,000 American forces.<\/p>\n

South Korea’s liberal President Moon Jae-in has supported Trump’s pressure campaign against North Koream but he’s less confrontational than the U.S. president and favours dialogue to ease the North’s nuclear threats. Moon has long said he sees the Pyeongchang Olympics as a chance to improve inter-Korean ties.<\/p>\n

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the U.S. would continue to put \u201cmaximum pressure\u201d on North Korea to give up its nukes. She added that South Korea shares that goal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014 President Donald Trump sounded open Tuesday to the possibility of an inter-Korean dialogue after North Korean leader Kim …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":139239,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24157,16],"tags":[41506,41425,14087],"class_list":["post-143421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-american-news","category-news","tag-korea-dialogue","tag-north-korean-leader-kim-jong-un","tag-president-donald-trump","mauthors-matthew-pennington","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143421"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143421\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/139239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}