{"id":142419,"date":"2017-12-27T23:17:02","date_gmt":"2017-12-28T04:17:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=142419"},"modified":"2017-12-27T23:17:02","modified_gmt":"2017-12-28T04:17:02","slug":"california-company-has-pot-license-workers-still-arrested","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/12\/27\/california-company-has-pot-license-workers-still-arrested\/","title":{"rendered":"California company has pot license, workers still arrested"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"The<\/a>
The workers for Old Kai Distribution were transporting the marijuana from a farm when they were pulled over Friday afternoon by a California Highway Patrol officer on Highway 101 near Ukiah, according to Joe Rogoway, an attorney for the company. (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

SACRAMENTO, Calif. \u2014 The confusing rollout of marijuana regulations in California has been underscored in Mendocino County, where local authorities licensed a company to deliver pot only to have state police arrest two employees who were trying to do just that with nearly a ton of weed.<\/p>\n

The workers for Old Kai Distribution were transporting the marijuana from a farm when they were pulled over Friday afternoon by a California Highway Patrol officer on Highway 101 near Ukiah, according to Joe Rogoway, an attorney for the company. They were driving an unmarked van and were stopped for a traffic violation.<\/p>\n

The workers showed the officer the company’s county license and a manifest for the marijuana, but the officer insisted it was illegal, called for backup and arrested the men.<\/p>\n

The company argues it can transport marijuana within the county with its local license, and county spokeswoman Sarah Dukett backed that interpretation. She said Old Kai was issued a distribution license last week that allows it to legally transport marijuana under two local ordinances passed earlier this year.<\/p>\n

The workers were cited for unlawful transportation of marijuana and unlawful possession for sale. Investigators also seized all of the marijuana and the company’s van.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is incomprehensible that this has occurred,\u201d said Rogoway, who sent a letter to CHP demanding that the charges be dropped and the marijuana returned to Old Kai.<\/p>\n

Acting California Highway Patrol Commissioner Warren Stanley said the arrest was appropriate because a state license also is required for legal transport and those permits don’t take effect until Monday, when broad legalization arrives in California.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey are following the laws that are in place now,\u201d Stanley said Wednesday, referring to his officers. \u201cAnd when Jan. 1, 2018, comes they’ll start following the laws that come into effect on that date.\u201d<\/p>\n

The officer who made the Ukiah stop was not targeting the business, said Stanley, who is not aware of any other arrests of a locally licensed marijuana operation. CHP primarily is concerned with drivers who could be high behind the wheel and the agency has trained 97 per cent of its officers and sergeants in advanced drugged driving recognition skills, he said.<\/p>\n

Stanley commented after a ceremony for CHP Officer Andrew Camilleri, who was killed on Christmas Eve by a driver believed to be drunk and high.<\/p>\n

California has had legal medical marijuana for two decades. In 2016, voters approved broad legalization and the state and communities that want such \u201cadult use\u201d marijuana businesses spent the last year writing complex regulations.<\/p>\n

Some didn’t get their regulations finalized in time to start issuing local licenses by Jan. 1 while others decided to outlaw recreational pot altogether. Meantime, all forms of pot remain illegal under federal law.<\/p>\n

The marijuana that was seized in Mendocino County, about 115 miles (185 kilometres) north of San Francisco, had been collected from a family-owned farm and was being brought to a distribution centre to be sorted and tested.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis was basically their entire harvest,\u201d Rogoway said. \u201cTheir entire year was in the back of this vehicle. If that cannabis is destroyed, it really puts at risk the safety and well-being of their family.\u201d<\/p>\n

He worried the arrest could have a chilling effect as the state and local governments encourage marijuana businesses to come out of the shadows and adhere to regulations to ensure a level playing field for all.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis incident highlights the fear that many people have,\u201d he said. \u201cIt takes a lot to be a complaint operator. Even if they follow through with the whole process, something bad can happen. This is a perfect example.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SACRAMENTO, Calif. \u2014 The confusing rollout of marijuana regulations in California has been underscored in Mendocino County, where local authorities …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":142423,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24157,16],"tags":[40799,3709,40800,27865,40801],"class_list":["post-142419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-american-news","category-news","tag-california-company","tag-license","tag-marijuana-regulations","tag-mendocino-county","tag-old-kai-distribution","mauthors-michael-balsamo","mauthors-don-thompson","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=142419"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142419\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/142423"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=142419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=142419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=142419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}