{"id":141298,"date":"2017-12-22T06:13:22","date_gmt":"2017-12-22T11:13:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=141298"},"modified":"2017-12-22T06:13:22","modified_gmt":"2017-12-22T11:13:22","slug":"ejercito-positive-ca-will-approve-duques-appointment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/12\/22\/ejercito-positive-ca-will-approve-duques-appointment\/","title":{"rendered":"Ejercito positive CA will approve Duque&#8217;s appointment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Senator JV Ejercito\u00a0on Friday\u00a0expressed confidence that newly-appointed Health Secretary Francisco Duque III won\u2019t have a hard time getting the approval of the bicameral Commission on Appointments (CA).<\/p>\n<p>According to the chairman of the Senate health committee, \u201cSecretary Duque is a decent person with high integrity and credibility. I don\u2019t think he will have a hard time with the CA.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ejercito also expressed eagerness in working with him very soon.<\/p>\n<p>If Duque would receive a nod from CA, it would be his second time to head DOH, as he had held the same position during the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo administration.<\/p>\n<p>Duque replaced Paulyn Ubial whose temporary appointment was rejected by the CA last October 10.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DAILY NEWS ROUND UP FOR 10\/\u00a027 \/17<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Senator JV Ejercito\u00a0on Friday\u00a0expressed confidence that newly-appointed Health Secretary Francisco Duque III won\u2019t have a hard time getting the approval &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":114184,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-uncategorized","mauthors-ro-angelica-equio","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141298\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/114184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=141298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=141298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}