{"id":140263,"date":"2017-12-19T02:47:30","date_gmt":"2017-12-19T07:47:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=140263"},"modified":"2017-12-19T02:47:30","modified_gmt":"2017-12-19T07:47:30","slug":"japan-approves-missile-defence-system-amid-nkorea-threat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/12\/19\/japan-approves-missile-defence-system-amid-nkorea-threat\/","title":{"rendered":"Japan approves missile defence system amid NKorea threat"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_140271\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-140271\" style=\"width: 426px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/408800853_691039a5c8_z.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-140271\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/408800853_691039a5c8_z.jpg\" alt=\"Japan's Cabinet on Tuesday approved a plan to purchase a set of costly land-based U.S. missile combat systems to increase the country's defence capabilities amid escalating threats from North Korea. (Photo by Ruth Hartnup\/Flickr, CC BY 2.0)\" width=\"426\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/408800853_691039a5c8_z.jpg 426w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/408800853_691039a5c8_z-200x300.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 426px) 100vw, 426px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-140271\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Japan&#8217;s Cabinet on Tuesday approved a plan to purchase a set of costly land-based U.S. missile combat systems to increase the country&#8217;s defence capabilities amid escalating threats from North Korea. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ruthanddave\/408800853\/in\/photolist-C8dfz-bcTPCX-SnGHq9-qp58i7-74De4n-6dpz4k-deSSTA-9xoUST-5NJDds-8Adgtf-e4Jro9-a1VaDq-bYLbvy-9moxrU-UXCdfX-9rUTy2-f761Ae-pKWhZ-Ld4CE-9KWQ5a-bn1Ymz-dJeFgQ-7SXFXM-4yPopz-5JyUSQ-8NPwrt-rr1A3R-7eQ92y-9raDEz-H5hpP-fjoYb3-4yUWDC-27FGa-21V3uEf-4hXNpm-Utu1sf-8G4KeB-4yPFFT-6nwvcd-9B3mdW-3xRdh7-5uD27b-JfNqn-2p4sYy-avAkd-k8DvAF-eKMisT-8XdEvN-d4mzh5-7feC5u\">Photo<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ruthanddave\/\">Ruth Hartnup\/Flickr<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>TOKYO \u2014 Japan&#8217;s Cabinet on Tuesday approved a plan to purchase a set of costly land-based U.S. missile combat systems to increase the country&#8217;s defence capabilities amid escalating threats from North Korea.<\/p>\n<p>The approval will allow the Defence Ministry to buy two Aegis Ashore systems to add to Japan&#8217;s current two-step missile defence consisting of Patriot batteries and Aegis-equipped destroyers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNorth Korea&#8217;s nuclear and missile development has become a greater and more imminent threat for Japan&#8217;s national security, and we need to drastically improve our ballistic missile defence capability to protect Japan continuously and sustainably,\u201d a statement issued by the Cabinet said.<\/p>\n<p>The deployment will add to growing defence costs in Japan as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe&#8217;s government pushes to allow the military a greater\u00a0international\u00a0role and boost its missile combat capability.<\/p>\n<p>Defence officials say two Aegis Ashore units can cover Japan entirely by using advanced missile interceptors such as SM-3 Block IIA that was jointly developed by Japan and the U.S., and would cost around 200 billion yen ($1.8 billion), though they have not released exact figures.<\/p>\n<p>Officials say they hope the systems are ready for operation by 2023.<\/p>\n<p>Officials refused to disclose cost details until a planned release of a 2018 budget, in which defence spending is expected to rise to a record.<\/p>\n<p>Abe has said he fully backs U.S. President Donald Trump&#8217;s policy of keeping all options on the table, including possible military actions, against the North. Abe has vowed to bolster Japan&#8217;s security co-operation and increase use of advanced U.S. missile defence equipment.<\/p>\n<p>Defence officials declined to give details about potential sites for Aegis Ashore deployment, while Japanese reports cited Self-Defence Force bases in Akita, northern Japan, and Yamaguchi, in southwestern Japan.<\/p>\n<p>Defence officials said they chose Aegis Ashore over an option of Terminal High-Altitude Area Defence, or THAAD, because of its cheaper cost and versatility. Typically, a THAAD setup comes with 48 missiles and 9 mobile launch pads, priced about $1.1 billion, and Japan would need at least six of those to defend the country, officials said.<\/p>\n<p>The deployment of THAAD in South Korea triggered protests from China as Beijing sees it a security threat.<\/p>\n<p>Aegis Ashore can be compatible with the ship-based Aegis systems that are on four Japanese destroyers and also could work with SM-6 interceptors capable of shooting down cruise missiles, defence officials said. Japan plans to add four more Aegis-equipped destroyers in coming years.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. has installed the land-fixed Aegis in Romania and Poland, and Japan will be a third to host the system.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TOKYO \u2014 Japan&#8217;s Cabinet on Tuesday approved a plan to purchase a set of costly land-based U.S. missile combat systems &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":140271,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[667,39617,1509],"class_list":["post-140263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","tag-japan","tag-missile-defence-system","tag-north-korea","mauthors-mari-yamaguchi","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140263\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/140271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}