{"id":139565,"date":"2017-12-15T20:49:27","date_gmt":"2017-12-16T01:49:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=139565"},"modified":"2017-12-15T20:49:27","modified_gmt":"2017-12-16T01:49:27","slug":"house-panel-okays-church-annulment-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/12\/15\/house-panel-okays-church-annulment-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"House panel okays church annulment bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_101700\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-101700\" style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/horlogo.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-101700\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/horlogo.png\" alt=\"The bill also provides that the decree of annulment shall be recorded in the appropriate civil registry within 30 days from the issuance of the final judgment.  (PNA photo)\" width=\"490\" height=\"490\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/horlogo.png 490w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/horlogo-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/horlogo-300x300.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 490px) 100vw, 490px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-101700\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The bill also provides that the decree of annulment shall be recorded in the appropriate civil registry within 30 days from the issuance of the final judgment. <a href=\"http:\/\/58.71.118.44\/\/images\/horlogo.png\">(PNA photo)<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA\u2014<\/strong>\u00a0The proposed measure seeking to recognize the civil effects of church annulment or dissolution of certain marriages by different religious sects in the country has hurdled the committee level in the House of Representatives.<\/p>\n<p>According to a statement on Friday, the House committee on population and family relations approved an unnumbered substitute bill, otherwise known as the \u201cChurch Decreed Annulment.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The bill provides that whenever a marriage, duly and legally solemnized by a priest, minister, imam, rabbi or presiding elder of any church or religious sect in the Philippines is subsequently annulled or dissolved in a final judgment or decree by said church or religion, the said annulment or dissolution shall have the same effect as a decree of annulment or dissolution issued by a competent court.<\/p>\n<p>The bill also provides that the decree of annulment shall be recorded in the appropriate civil registry within 30 days from the issuance of the final judgment.<\/p>\n<p>Deputy Speaker Gwendolyn Garcia, principal author of the bill, said while marriage is an institution that the State is interested in, it is also a religious act.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor the predominant Catholics of our country, it is a sacrament and marriage is not considered valid insofar as Catholics are concerned unless celebrated in accordance with the solemnities of the church. Marriage, therefore, is an element in the exercise of religious freedom,\u201d Garcia said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo logically, if the marriage, insofar as the contracting parties are concerned, is validated by the laws of the Church, then it necessarily follows that by the same laws, such marriage can also be invalidated or annulled,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u2014\u00a0The proposed measure seeking to recognize the civil effects of church annulment or dissolution of certain marriages by different religious &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":101700,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[95],"tags":[39143,39144],"class_list":["post-139565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ph","tag-house-panel-okays-church-annulment-bill","tag-church-decreed-annulment","mauthors-filane-mikee-cervantes","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139565\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/101700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}