{"id":139159,"date":"2017-12-14T05:21:45","date_gmt":"2017-12-14T10:21:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=139159"},"modified":"2017-12-14T05:21:45","modified_gmt":"2017-12-14T10:21:45","slug":"senators-oppose-trillanes-invite-to-dutertes-son-and-son-in-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/12\/14\/senators-oppose-trillanes-invite-to-dutertes-son-and-son-in-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Senators oppose Trillanes\u2019 invite to Duterte\u2019s son and son-in-law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Ribbon Committee Chair Senator Richard Gordon and Majority leader Vicente Sotto III did not see the need to invite President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s son Paolo Dutere and son-in-law Mans Carpio to show up in the hearing as demanded by Senator Antonio Trillanes IV.<\/p>\n<p>Trillanes was pushing for Paolo and Carpio to appear in the probe of the P6.4 billion drug shipment passing through the Bureau of Customs (BOC).<\/p>\n<p>This was after a witness, Mark Taguba II exposed to the investigating panel an excnahbge of text messges between him and a certain \u201cTita Nina\u201d where the names \u201cPulong\u201d and \u201cMance\u201d, nicknames of Paolo and Carpio respectively, appeared.<\/p>\n<p>The senators said that solid evidence must be presented first before Trillanes demand can be allowed.<\/p>\n<p>Trillanes, unpleased with the opposition he had received, called the Blue Ribbon Committee a \u201ccommittee de abswelto\u201d and an \u201cirrational ruling\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>In response to Trillanes statements, Gordon told him that \u201cYou\u2019re out of order. I will not dignify your statements\u201d, stressing that he is always acted rationally, pertaining to the hearing s in the senate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>(DAILY NEWS ROUND UP FOR 08 \/\u00a031 \/ 17)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Ribbon Committee Chair Senator Richard Gordon and Majority leader Vicente Sotto III did not see the need to invite &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":114184,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-139159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-uncategorized","mauthors-ro-angelica-equio","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139159"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139159\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/114184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}