{"id":136902,"date":"2017-12-06T05:48:22","date_gmt":"2017-12-06T10:48:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=136902"},"modified":"2017-12-06T05:49:03","modified_gmt":"2017-12-06T10:49:03","slug":"australia-mediates-over-south-china-sea-dispute-thru-foreign-policy-paper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/12\/06\/australia-mediates-over-south-china-sea-dispute-thru-foreign-policy-paper\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia mediates over South China Sea dispute thru foreign policy paper"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"(Shutterstock<\/a>
Australia is particularly concerned by the unprecedented pace and scale of China’s activities (Shutterstock photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Australian government expressed its concern over China\u2019s activities in disputed islands in the South China Sea.<\/p>\n

While Australia claimed that their government is not taking any sides in the matter especially that they are not a claimant of the South China Sea, they stressed in the 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper they released a few weeks ago, that they wish to \u201cbuild a region where disputes are solved peacefully and in accordance with international law.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have urged all claimants to refrain from actions that could increase tension and have called for a halt to land reclamation and construction activities. Australia is particularly concerned by the unprecedented pace and scale of China\u2019s activities,\u201d the paper read.<\/p>\n

It added that \u201cAustralia opposes the use of disputed features and artificial structures in the South China Sea for military purposes. We support the resolution of differences through negotiation based on international law.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Australian government also stressed that all claimants should clarify the full nature and extent of the claims in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Government reaffirms its position that the Permanent Court of Arbitration\u2019s ruling on the Philippines South China Sea Arbitration is final and binding on both parties,\u201d it read.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, China hits back at Australia calling its foreign policy paper \u201cirresponsible\u201d since it is not part of the South China Sea disputes.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt has been proven by facts that interference from countries outside the region can only complicate the South China Sea issue and will be of no help to regional peace and stability,\u201d Chinese Defense Ministry spokesperson Wu Qian said in a press briefing.<\/p>\n

In an article by South China Morning Post, Australia\u2019s foreign minister from 2012-2013, Bob Carr, said that Australia as a neutral country should remain neutral and avoid making it seem like it is taking sides.<\/p>\n

Carr is now the director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Australian government expressed its concern over China\u2019s activities in disputed islands in the South China Sea. While Australia claimed …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":136908,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,17],"tags":[37377,268,37379,420,1039,37378],"class_list":["post-136902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-w","tag-2017-foreign-policy-white-paper","tag-australia","tag-bob-carr","tag-china","tag-south-china-sea","tag-wu-qian","mauthors-bea-kirstein-t-manalaysay","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136902\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/136908"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}