{"id":134001,"date":"2017-11-25T07:12:27","date_gmt":"2017-11-25T12:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=134001"},"modified":"2017-11-25T07:12:27","modified_gmt":"2017-11-25T12:12:27","slug":"canadian-screen-industry-to-move-speedily-on-drafting-new-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/11\/25\/canadian-screen-industry-to-move-speedily-on-drafting-new-code\/","title":{"rendered":"Canadian screen industry to &#8216;move speedily&#8217; on drafting new code"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_134002\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-134002\" style=\"width: 342px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/comic.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-134002\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/comic.jpg\" alt=\" (Photo by David Sparrow)\" width=\"342\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/comic.jpg 342w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/comic-238x300.jpg 238w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 342px) 100vw, 342px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-134002\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: David Sparrow (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.davesparrow.com\/corporate.html\">Photo by David Sparrow<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>TORONTO &#8212; Groups representing Canada&#8217;s screen and stage talent say they feel a sense of \u201curgency\u201d in implementing a new collective approach to end sexual harassment, but they also want to get it right.<\/p>\n<p>Representatives from 16 organizations &#8212; including the actors&#8217; union ACTRA, the Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television, and the Director&#8217;s Guild of Canada (DGC) &#8212; gathered with a moderator and a few lawyers Thursday in a five-hour, closed-door meeting in Toronto to discuss sexual harassment, discrimination, bullying and violence.<\/p>\n<p>They emerged with an agreement that there should be \u201czero tolerance for such behaviour\u201d and a recognition \u201cthat increasing gender equality and diversity across our industry is an important part of the solution,\u201d according to a statement.<\/p>\n<p>They also committed to four steps, including \u201cenacting an industry-wide code of conduct\u201d that would clearly define expectations of appropriate and inappropriate behaviour, enforcement and consequences.<\/p>\n<p>In an interview Friday, David Sparrow, national president of ACTRA, didn&#8217;t want to give a timeline on when the measures might be implemented.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am saying that we&#8217;re going to move speedily on this,\u201d he said by phone.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe want to have things in place as soon as possible. But the entire group believes that getting it right is more important than doing it fast.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>His thoughts were echoed by Kendrie Upton, executive director of the DGC&#8217;s B.C. branch, who is the guild&#8217;s national lead on anti-harassment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think to hesitate will cost us valuable momentum,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut at the same time it&#8217;s equally important that we do this right and we need a process to bring about fair, thoughtful, effective measures.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Upton said the meeting gave her \u201ca real sense of optimism around the culture shift\u201d they&#8217;re aiming to create.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo see all of the major organizations at that table ready and willing to work together to design a new normal that ensures that people get a safe and respectful workplace on Canadian sets &#8212; it&#8217;s awe-inspiring, actually,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s a change that will require a lot of people to commit a lot of time and energy but I really felt that willingness in the room yesterday in a genuine way.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sparrow is heading up a group that is drafting the new industry code of conduct.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn terms of this code of conduct, I&#8217;m not a lawyer so I don&#8217;t know to what degree it will be legally binding on people,\u201d said Sparrow.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think that it&#8217;s one of those things that, if the industry comes out with one voice and says, &#8216;We have all agreed to the following conduct on our sets,&#8217; then certainly we would have the moral ground to be able to say, &#8216;Well, your organization signed on to this code of conduct, correct? &#8230; and therefore, since one of your members has transgressed in this or that way, then I&#8217;m sure that you plan to do something about that.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd we would hope, and I would expect, based on the kind of conversations we had yesterday, that people will respond in a positive way at that time and will deal with those members.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Toronto actress Mia Kirshner, who says she&#8217;s a survivor of harassment in the industry and sexual assault, is hoping Sparrow and ACTRA will also participate in an event for the #AfterMeToo group she co-created.<\/p>\n<p>#AfterMeToo, which also includes screen industry leaders from across Canada, aims \u201cto ensure that appropriate legislation, culture and policy shift to protect the survivor rather than the predator.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe think he should be there to speak, because really, if the people creating the legislation and policies are working to the exclusion of hearing those affected by the policy, how can that be effective? I want it to be effective. It has to be effective,\u201d Kirshner said.<\/p>\n<p>Sparrow said he isn&#8217;t able to go to the first #AfterMeToo roundtable discussion on Dec. 5, noting it conflicts with the \u201cnewest elected ACTRA Toronto council meeting and a number of other events that are happening that day.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Kirshner said she tried to get in on ACTRA&#8217;s closed-door meetings on the topic but hasn&#8217;t been allowed.<\/p>\n<p>While she was invited by ACTRA to be a part of a new committee to deal with the topic, she declined because they didn&#8217;t give her specifics on what it involved.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWas it democratically formed? What was the purpose? What kind of independence would we have?\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI feel very strongly that if I&#8217;m going to add my name to something, I need to know what I&#8217;m adding it to and to what purpose this is, not a vague collection of ideas.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Asked whether he would consider attending another #AfterMeToo event on a different date, Sparrow said he would \u201cconsider the concept.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur communications folks have been in touch with them, we&#8217;re certainly willing to share information with them,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI&#8217;m always willing to sit down with anybody and have a discussion about next steps we can take and how we can make the industry stronger and better.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TORONTO &#8212; Groups representing Canada&#8217;s screen and stage talent say they feel a sense of \u201curgency\u201d in implementing a new &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":134002,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,106],"tags":[35116,35115,35117,9961,12680,27722,27723,1073,691],"class_list":["post-134001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","category-hollywood","tag-aftermetoo","tag-academy-of-canadian-cinema-and-television","tag-david-sparrow","tag-directors-guild-of-canada","tag-discrimination","tag-mia-kirshner","tag-sexual-harassment","tag-toronto","tag-violence","mauthors-victoria-ahearn","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134001\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/134002"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}