{"id":133169,"date":"2017-11-22T03:43:25","date_gmt":"2017-11-22T08:43:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=133169"},"modified":"2017-11-22T03:43:25","modified_gmt":"2017-11-22T08:43:25","slug":"trillanes-files-libel-complaint-vs-thinking-pinoy-blogger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/11\/22\/trillanes-files-libel-complaint-vs-thinking-pinoy-blogger\/","title":{"rendered":"Trillanes files libel complaint vs Thinking Pinoy blogger"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_85881\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-85881\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/1530569_735605796451652_1967789247_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-85881\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/1530569_735605796451652_1967789247_n.jpg\" alt=\"FILE: Senator Antonio Trillanes IV filed a libel complaint against pro-Duterte blogger Rey Joseph \u201cRJ\u201d Nieto, the person behind the blog Thinking Pinoy, over his Facebook post where United States (US) President Donald Trump allegedly called the senator a \u201cdrug lord.\u201d (Photo: Antonio &quot;Sonny&quot; Trillanes IV\/Facebook)\" width=\"960\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/1530569_735605796451652_1967789247_n.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/1530569_735605796451652_1967789247_n-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/1530569_735605796451652_1967789247_n-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-85881\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Senator Antonio Trillanes IV filed a libel complaint against pro-Duterte blogger Rey Joseph \u201cRJ\u201d Nieto, the person behind the blog Thinking Pinoy, over his Facebook post where United States (US) President Donald Trump allegedly called the senator a \u201cdrug lord.\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sonnytrillanes.official\/photos\/a.493419727336928.116866.135261979819373\/735605796451652\/?type=3&amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sonnytrillanes.official\/\">Antonio &#8220;Sonny&#8221; Trillanes IV\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Senator Antonio Trillanes IV filed a libel complaint against pro-Duterte blogger Rey Joseph \u201cRJ\u201d Nieto, the person behind the blog Thinking Pinoy, over his Facebook post where he alleged that\u00a0 United States (US) President Donald Trump called the senator a \u201cdrug lord.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trillanes formally filed the complaint before the Pasay City Prosecutor\u2019s Office early Wednesday, asking for the imprisonment of the blogger and payment for civil damages.<\/p>\n<p>Last October 31, Nieto posted an article on the \u201cThe Thinking Pinoy\u201d Facebook page with the headline \u201cTrump calls Trillanes a Drug Lord.\u201d Nieto mentioned a purported report where the US President allegedly called Trillanes a \u201clittle narco\u201d or a drug lord.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDoes Trump\u2019s government know something?\u201d Nieto added in his post.<\/p>\n<p>The complaint, which alleges libel under the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, stated that Nieto\u2019s post was a malicious imputation that was \u201cpublished far and wide and all over the world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Nieto\u2019s post has gained 62,000 reactions on Facebook and was shared 15,759 times as of November 22, 2017.<\/p>\n<p>He said that the blogger\u2019s claim constitutes \u2018fake news,\u2019 adding that Nieto failed to cite the source or the news outfit which purportedly conducted the supposed interview with Trump.<\/p>\n<p>Trillanes added that the transcripts of Trump\u2019s press engagements, provided by the US embassy, does not include comments about him and as a matter of fact, the Philippine Star even verified the blogger\u2019s post and came out with an article \u201cNo Trump mention of Trillanes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Being a very vocal and staunch critic of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, of whom Respondent Nieto is a self-confessed diehard supporter and defender, Respondent Nieto&#8217;s post was clearly made solely for the purpose of besmirching my reputation and maligning my name,&#8221; Trillanes said in his complaint.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNeedless to state, since the Respondent Nieto caused the publication of the derogatory post through the electronic medium (i.e., using a computer system), respondent is clearly guilty of the cybercrime offense of\u00a0LIBEL, as defined and penalized under the Cybercrime Prevention Act,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>The senator is seeking payment for civil damages amounting to P2-million for both moral and exemplary damages, and another P250,000 to cover legal fees.<\/p>\n<p>Aside from Nieto, Trillanes had earlier filed cyber-libel and graft complaints against another pro-administration blogger, Presidential Communications Assistant Secretary Mocha Uson, for spreading \u201cfake news\u201d about his alleged offshore bank accounts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Senator Antonio Trillanes IV filed a libel complaint against pro-Duterte blogger Rey Joseph \u201cRJ\u201d Nieto, the person behind the blog &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":85881,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95,483],"tags":[5896,22310,34579],"class_list":["post-133169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","category-politics","tag-antonio-trillanes-iv","tag-libel-complaint","tag-rey-joseph-rj-nieto","mauthors-joanna-belle-deala","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133169\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/85881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}