{"id":129501,"date":"2017-11-08T03:11:22","date_gmt":"2017-11-08T08:11:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=129501"},"modified":"2017-11-08T03:11:22","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T08:11:22","slug":"disney-reverses-ban-on-l-a-times-critics-from-screenings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/11\/08\/disney-reverses-ban-on-l-a-times-critics-from-screenings\/","title":{"rendered":"Disney reverses ban on L.A. Times critics from screenings"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"FILE:<\/a>
FILE: Walt Disney logo<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

LOS ANGELES \u2014 The Walt Disney Co. on Tuesday lifted its ban of Los Angeles Times reporters and critics from its press screenings after a widespread backlash prompted several media outlets to announce their own boycotts of Disney movies.<\/p>\n

In a statement Tuesday, Disney said it was restoring access to the newspaper after \u201cproductive discussions with the newly installed leadership\u201d at the Los Angeles Times. Disney had barred the Times from its screenings after the paper published a two-part investigative series on the company’s business dealings in Anaheim, California, where Disneyland is.<\/p>\n

Disney’s punitive measures against the Times led to many outlets refusing advance coverage of the studio’s films, including The New York Times, the Boston Globe and The A.V. Club. Four prominent film critics groups announced Tuesday that they would bar Disney films from receiving awards consideration<\/p>\n

The ban’s withdraw Tuesday ended an unusual clash between Hollywood’s arguably most powerful studio and the media outlets that regularly write about its movies.<\/p>\n

The Los Angeles Film Critics Association, the New York Film Critics Circle, the Boston Society of Film Critics and the National Society of Film Critics all said that wouldn’t consider Disney films for their year-end awards. The critics groups noted that it was \u201cadmittedly extraordinary\u201d to \u201ctake any action that might penalize film artists for decisions beyond their control.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBut Disney brought forth this action when it chose to punish The Times’ journalists rather than express its disagreement with a business story via ongoing public discussion,\u201d the statement continued. \u201cDisney’s response should gravely concern all who believe in the importance of a free press, artists included.\u201d<\/p>\n

The New York Times said in a statement Tuesday that it wouldn’t attend preview screenings of Disney films while the LA Times can’t, saying Disney’s move is a \u201cdangerous precedent and not at all in the public interest.\u201d<\/p>\n

Disney on Friday said that the Times series in September detailing what it characterized as a complicated and increasingly tense relationship between Anaheim and the company showed \u201ca complete disregard for basic journalistic standards.\u201d It added that the Times published a \u201cbiased and inaccurate series, wholly driven by a political agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n

Daniel Miller, the Times reporter who wrote the series, tweeted that \u201cDisney never asked for a correction.\u201d The newspaper declined further comment.<\/p>\n

With the ban concluded, critics said they would return to business as usual. Disney’s upcoming films are the Pixar release \u201cCoco\u201d and \u201cStar Wars: The Last Jedi.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cSee you guys at the Coco screening,\u201d wrote New York Times critic A.O. Scott.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

LOS ANGELES \u2014 The Walt Disney Co. on Tuesday lifted its ban of Los Angeles Times reporters and critics from …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":61022,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,106],"tags":[9826,568,15735],"class_list":["post-129501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","category-hollywood","tag-critics","tag-disney","tag-los-angeles-times","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129501"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129501\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/61022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}