{"id":128019,"date":"2017-11-02T05:47:21","date_gmt":"2017-11-02T09:47:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=128019"},"modified":"2017-11-02T05:47:21","modified_gmt":"2017-11-02T09:47:21","slug":"almost-half-of-filipinos-think-death-of-innocent-in-drug-war-inevitable-sws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/11\/02\/almost-half-of-filipinos-think-death-of-innocent-in-drug-war-inevitable-sws\/","title":{"rendered":"Almost half of Filipinos think death of innocent in drug war inevitable \u2013 SWS"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_126466\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-126466\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/shutterstock_657916006.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-126466\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/shutterstock_657916006.jpg\" alt=\"The 46% was composed of 21% who strongly agree, and 24% who somewhat agree. The portion of those who did not agree reached 35%, with 15% who somewhat disagree, and 20% who strongly disagree. The remaining 19% were undecided. (Shutterstock photo)\" width=\"1000\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/shutterstock_657916006.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/shutterstock_657916006-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/shutterstock_657916006-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-126466\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The 46% was composed of 21% who strongly agree, and 24% who somewhat agree. The portion of those who did not agree reached 35%, with 15% who somewhat disagree, and 20% who strongly disagree. The remaining 19% were undecided. (Shutterstock photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A Social Weather Stations (SWS) Survey found that 46% of adult Filipinos agree that innocent citizens dying in the government\u2019s war against illegal drugs cannot be avoided.<\/p>\n<p>Fielded on September 23-27, the Third Quarter 2017 SWS survey summed up the answers of 1500 adults nationwide through face-to-face interviews which revealed a net agreement score of +10, classified as moderately strong.<\/p>\n<p>The 46% was composed of 21% who strongly agree, and 24% who somewhat agree. The portion of those who did not agree reached 35%, with 15% who somewhat disagree, and 20% who strongly disagree. The remaining 19% were undecided.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNet agreement that innocent casualties cannot be avoided in the drug war was highest in the Visayas at a moderately strong +21,\u201d SWS said.<\/p>\n<p>This was followed by Metro Manila at a moderately strong +18, Balance Luzon at a neutral +9, and lastly, Mindanao at a neutral +1.<\/p>\n<p>SWS noted that the net satisfaction with President Rodrigo Duterte of those who agreed and disagreed highly varied.<\/p>\n<p>This survey also found that 49% agree that the administration had people who secretly observe and report citizens who use and sell illegal drugs.<\/p>\n<p>The 25% of strongly agree and 24% somewhat agree.<\/p>\n<p>19% disagree, with 10% who somewhat disagree, and 10% (correctly rounded) who strongly disagree. The remaining 31% were undecided.<\/p>\n<p>According to SWS, \u201cThis gives a net agreement score of moderately strong +29.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The net agreement was highest in Metro Manila scoring +50, classified as extremely strong. This was followed by Balance Luzon at a moderately strong +29, Mindanao at a moderately strong +26, then Visayas at a moderately strong +21.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Net satisfaction with Pres. Duterte (<em>good<\/em>\u00a0+38) tends to be lower among those who\u00a0disagree\u00a0that\u00a0<em>t<\/em>he government probably has people who secretly observe and report drug users and pushers, compared to those who agree (<em>very good\u00a0<\/em>+52) and were undecided (<em>good<\/em>\u00a0+47),&#8221; the report said.<\/p>\n<p>Respondents were asked if they strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, strongly disagree, or were undecided to the statement \u201c<em>Hindi maiiwasan na may mamatay na inosenteng mamamayan upang tuluyang masugpo ang<\/em> illegal <em>na droga sa ating bansa<\/em> (It cannot be avoided that there are innocent citizens who will die in order to completely eradicate the illegal drug problem in the country).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>They were also asked what they thought of the statement \u201c<em>Sa lugar namin, malamang na may mga tauhan ang administrasyon na sekretong nag-oobserba at nagsusumbong kung sinu-sino ang mga gumagamit at kung sinu-sino ang mga nagbebenta ng mga<\/em> <em>ilegal na droga<\/em> (In our area, the administration probably has people who secretly observe and report those who are user and those who are sellers of illegal drugs)<\/p>\n<p>600 respondents came from Balance Luzon, 300 from Metro Manila, 300 from Visayas, and 300 from Mindanao.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Social Weather Stations (SWS) Survey found that 46% of adult Filipinos agree that innocent citizens dying in the government\u2019s &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":126466,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[12253,30883,2444,11790,27296],"class_list":["post-128019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-war-on-drugs","tag-death-of-innocent-citizens","tag-rodrigo-duterte","tag-social-weather-stations","tag-third-quarter-2017-sws-survey","mauthors-bea-kirstein-t-manalaysay","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128019"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128019\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/126466"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}