{"id":127763,"date":"2017-10-31T06:17:54","date_gmt":"2017-10-31T10:17:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=127763"},"modified":"2017-10-31T06:17:54","modified_gmt":"2017-10-31T10:17:54","slug":"federal-liberals-urged-to-accept-senate-change-to-sex-discrimination-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/10\/31\/federal-liberals-urged-to-accept-senate-change-to-sex-discrimination-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Liberals urged to accept Senate change to sex discrimination bill"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Prime<\/a>
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing increased public pressure from Indigenous women and a feminist alliance to accept a Senate amendment of legislation on sex-based discrimination under the Indian Act. (Photo<\/a> by DoD News\/Flickr<\/a>, CC BY 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

OTTAWA \u2014 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing increased public pressure from Indigenous women and a feminist alliance to accept a Senate amendment of legislation on sex-based discrimination under the Indian Act.<\/p>\n

Advocates have joined forces with two Aboriginal senators \u2014 Lillian Dyck and Sandra Lovelace-Nicholas \u2014 in an awareness campaign that kicked off this week urging the Liberal government to change the bill known as S-3.<\/p>\n

Part of the outreach, supported by the Canadian Feminist Alliance for International Action, includes the distribution of a letter to women’s organizations, academics and human rights groups to canvass support on the \u201cfull and final removal\u201d of sex discrimination in the Indian Act.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe write to you now because the government of Canada is poised to pass Bill S-3, a revision to the Indian Act, which will, one more time, remove discrimination for some but leave the core of the sex discrimination in place,\u201d the letter says.<\/p>\n

The discrimination has existed since the Indian Act was first introduced in 1876, the letter adds.<\/p>\n

Sharon McIvor, a plaintiff in a case resulting in a 2009 British Columbia Court of Appeal ruling on status for previously excluded Indigenous women and a signatory of the letter, said the campaign’s goal echoes work she’s done since the 1960s.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Indian Act has built into it a discriminatory scheme that is very hard on Aboriginal women,\u201d she said. \u201cWe have not been able to pass … our status on to our children the same way that the men do.\u201d<\/p>\n

In June, the Senate unanimously passed a change to Bill S-3 dubbed the \u201c6(1)(a) all the way\u201d amendment \u2014 a change designed to ensure Indian women and their descendants have full Indian status like Indian men do.<\/p>\n

The House of Commons, however, did not accept the Senate’s change and the government said it required more time to examine its impacts of the amendment. A message was then sent back to the Senate.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe message is essentially asking us to agree with them,\u201d Sen. Dyck said. \u201cI would say the vast majority of senators would say ‘No, we don’t agree with it because you took out the main amendment that we added in.\u201d’<\/p>\n

Eqality for Indigenous women remains on the line in what is clearly a human rights issue, Dyck added.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe prime minister is a feminist,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

\u201cHe’s gone around telling other countries, ‘Let’s advance women’s issues, let’s give women equality. But if you’re not going to give Indigenous women eqaulity, then there’s something clearly that doesn’t match up with your message to other people. Indigenous women deserve equality as much as any other woman.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a statement, the office of Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett insisted the federal government is committed to ensuring there is gender equity for all women in Canada.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will continue to work with First Nations, impacted individuals, experts and parliamentarians to remove all sex discrimination from registration provisions in the Indian Act,\u201d the office said.<\/p>\n

It also suggested it will be watching the Senate’s next move.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe debate on the current bill has yet to begin in the Senate, therefore, we cannot speculate or comment on how that debate in the Senate will evolve,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n

Shelagh Day, one of the founders of the feminist alliance, said the Senate was very clear about their position when it passed the amendment last spring.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a simple matter of whether women are treated in the Indian Act as men,\u201d she said. \u201cIt is 140 years after discriminatory legislation was passed. It is time to end it.\u201d<\/p>\n

She also said sex-based discrimination in the Indian Act is clearly linked to the murders and disappearances of Indigenous women and girls, now the subject of a national public inquiry.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is one of the root causes of the violence and has been identified both by the United Nations and by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights as a root cause of the violence,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe government itself has treated them as though they were not equal human beings and that has made them vulnerable in the broader society and in their own communities.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

OTTAWA \u2014 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing increased public pressure from Indigenous women and a feminist alliance to accept …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":127764,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[30658,19320,3070,30657,30659],"class_list":["post-127763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-feminist-alliance","tag-indigenous-women","tag-justin-trudeau","tag-public-pressure","tag-sex-based-discrimination","mauthors-kristy-kirkup","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=127763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127763\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/127764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=127763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=127763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=127763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}