{"id":12358,"date":"2014-05-27T16:13:05","date_gmt":"2014-05-27T08:13:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=12358"},"modified":"2014-05-28T16:30:26","modified_gmt":"2014-05-28T08:30:26","slug":"lacierda-denies-tres-marias-existence-in-palace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2014\/05\/27\/lacierda-denies-tres-marias-existence-in-palace\/","title":{"rendered":"Lacierda denies Tres Marias\u2019 existence in Palace"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_11549\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11549\" style=\"width: 1070px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Edwin-Lacierda.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-11549\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Edwin-Lacierda.png\" alt=\"Presidential Spokesperson Edwin Lacierda. Screenshot from May 14 press briefing.\" width=\"1070\" height=\"681\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Edwin-Lacierda.png 1070w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Edwin-Lacierda-300x190.png 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Edwin-Lacierda-1024x651.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1070px) 100vw, 1070px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-11549\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Presidential Spokesperson Edwin Lacierda. Screenshot from May 14 press briefing.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA &#8212; Malacanang spokesperson Edwin Lacierda labeled a newspaper report as \u201cincorrect\u201d after identifying the existence of &#8216;Tres Marias&#8217; in Malacanang.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8216;Tres Marias&#8217; are allegedly three women working as bagmen for high officials in the administration.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The source should update his information. It&#8217;s incorrect,&#8221; Lacierda said.<\/p>\n<p>In a press conference, Lacierda &#8212; questioning the report on the three ladies allegedly in-charge of fund raising activities in the palace &#8212; said facts published by the Daily Tribune were outdated.<\/p>\n<p>The three ladies were identified as Rochelle Ahoro, the personal secretary of the official; Odette Ong, the supposed assistant secretary of administration and finance; and Mary Antoinette Lucile Ortile, the alleged assistant to the Executive Secretary.<\/p>\n<p>However, the Malacanang official for whom the three ladies were reportedly working for was not named in the article.<\/p>\n<p>Lacierda also added that some names implicated in the report were honest employees and are committed in Aquino\u2019s \u201cstraight path\u201d while other names had long resigned from government office.<\/p>\n<p>He said the other people mentioned in the news article are honest individuals who report for work daily and are committed to the Aquino administration&#8217;s \u201c<em>daang matuwid<\/em> (straight path).\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA &#8212; Malacanang spokesperson Edwin Lacierda labeled a newspaper report as \u201cincorrect\u201d after identifying the existence of &#8216;Tres Marias&#8217; in &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":11549,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,95],"tags":[4156,4154,392,1579,4155],"class_list":["post-12358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news-ph","tag-bagmen","tag-palace","tag-pdaf-scam","tag-pork-barrel-scam","tag-tres-marias","mauthors-lei-fontamillas","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12358\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}