{"id":120940,"date":"2017-10-03T04:07:58","date_gmt":"2017-10-03T08:07:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=120940"},"modified":"2017-10-03T04:07:58","modified_gmt":"2017-10-03T08:07:58","slug":"i-left-because-i-was-not-happy-andi-eigenmann","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/10\/03\/i-left-because-i-was-not-happy-andi-eigenmann\/","title":{"rendered":"I left because I was not happy –Andi Eigenmann"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"(Photo:<\/a>
This time though, Andi Eigenmann’s reply revealed more than a fierce comeback. (Photo:<\/a> Andi Guck-Eigenmann\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Because of the freedom enjoyed by bashers and trolls in the world wide web, it is not that new for artists and prominent persons to, once in a while, reply to the rude comments thrown at them. This time though, Andi Eigenmann\u2019s reply revealed more than a fierce comeback.<\/p>\n

Instagram user @vieveyanong commented on one of Andi\u2019s post, calling the actress “snob” and “unpopular.” The netizen shared that Andi just raised an eyebrow when her sister approached the actress in the airport.<\/p>\n

Another user @60journey commented that Andi should “eat some humble pie” and should just be grateful that there are still fans that adore her though she is “not popular anymore.”<\/p>\n

\u201cKunti na lang <\/em>fans mo ganyan ka pa<\/em>. Even casual viewers like me, natu<\/em>-turn off sa ganyan<\/em> attitude (Your fanbase is small now yet you still act like that. Even casual viewers like me are turned off with that kind of attitude),\u201d the user added.<\/p>\n

This time, Andi finally wrote paragraphs that clarified issues and at the same time scratched more than the surface.<\/p>\n

The 27-year-old actress clarified that she does not snub people who actually acknowledge her but politely call on people who are rude. But the bigger bomb was dropped when she said, \u201cIf I wanted the life I had in the past, I wouldn’t have left showbiz.\u201d<\/p>\n

Andi explained that she chose the role of a full-time mom over the different roles in front of the camera and in the spotlight.<\/p>\n

\u201cFame is not the solution. And it pains me that people like you think that this is something I should even be sad about,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n

She then cleared that she will not trade the \u2018simple life\u2019 she has now for anything as she is the happiest now.<\/p>\n

\u201cSo don\u2019t assume. So don\u2019t speak in behalf of others. Because you do not know our story,\u201d Andi said.<\/p>\n

While this is not the first time for the actress to reply to her bashers on social media, this is the only time that she revealed an information that did not make it to the headlines yet.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Because of the freedom enjoyed by bashers and trolls in the world wide web, it is not that new for …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":120963,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,46],"tags":[8092,25832,8413],"class_list":["post-120940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","category-entertainment-ph","tag-andi-eigenmann","tag-basher","tag-showbiz","mauthors-bea-kirstein-t-manalaysay","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=120940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120940\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/120963"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=120940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=120940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}