{"id":119541,"date":"2017-09-26T02:57:44","date_gmt":"2017-09-26T06:57:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=119541"},"modified":"2017-09-26T02:57:44","modified_gmt":"2017-09-26T06:57:44","slug":"coffee-sold-in-california-could-carry-cancer-warning-labels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/09\/26\/coffee-sold-in-california-could-carry-cancer-warning-labels\/","title":{"rendered":"Coffee sold in California could carry cancer warning labels"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_119543\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-119543\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/33793029123_b4e42288cf_z.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-119543\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/33793029123_b4e42288cf_z.jpg\" alt=\"Coffee could carry an ominous cancer warning in California if a non-profit group prevails in a Los Angeles courtroom. (Photo by Rafael Salda\u00f1a\/Flickr, CC BY 2.0)\" width=\"640\" height=\"424\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/33793029123_b4e42288cf_z.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/33793029123_b4e42288cf_z-300x199.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-119543\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Coffee could carry an ominous cancer warning in California if a non-profit group prevails in a Los Angeles courtroom. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ikarusmedia\/33793029123\/in\/photolist-Tub7ea-ciruhj-dw7piE-dw7poL-6VxYH6-Hi6pC2-NP2Snx-NTBPiE-nQk8ia-cFSfsN-o9zM2M-dzBrCi-dJRLdn-cirujw-jb8PzY-o7NGe8-94dCfE-ecLWfo-an4DMk-8FpDy2-4ADmhi-tmzttw-oeqMih-7fRiKF-bvS2TS-jM4h8M-56P4E3-bUBCUc-adfDtJ-48bQCi-eeZsCn-dbuexQ-9xUBm8-gf9aB1-9sB2E1-pAprMj-dTyLqU-6CZSVd-ajXP71-dpJtjy-7iBogZ-83sf4R-H16SuU-NP2Swa-k2WYEw-dKWk7U-dYaDts-9pu2Sn-yf2ShB-aBRHHC\">Photo<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ikarusmedia\/\">Rafael Salda\u00f1a\/Flickr<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>LOS ANGELES \u2014 Coffee could carry an ominous cancer warning in California if a non-profit group prevails in a Los Angeles courtroom.<\/p>\n<p>An attorney representing the Council for Education and Research on Toxics is presenting evidence to a judge in a 7-year-old case aimed at Starbucks and distributors and retailers.<\/p>\n<p>The council says coffee companies violated a state law requiring they warn consumers about a chemical created in the roasting process that could cause cancer.<\/p>\n<p>Acrylamide is on the state&#8217;s list of dangerous chemicals that must be disclosed to consumers.<\/p>\n<p>Attorneys for about 90 companies acknowledge acrylamide is present but say it&#8217;s at harmless levels and is outweighed by benefits from drinking coffee.<\/p>\n<p>They also claim coffee should be exempt because the chemical results naturally from cooking coffee beans that&#8217;s necessary to make them tasty.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>LOS ANGELES \u2014 Coffee could carry an ominous cancer warning in California if a non-profit group prevails in a Los &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":119543,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,3],"tags":[385,24822,3969],"class_list":["post-119541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","category-lifestyle","tag-california","tag-cancer-warning-labels","tag-coffee","mauthors-brian-melley","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119541"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119541\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/119543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}