{"id":114499,"date":"2017-08-28T05:13:10","date_gmt":"2017-08-28T09:13:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=114499"},"modified":"2017-08-28T05:13:10","modified_gmt":"2017-08-28T09:13:10","slug":"trump-expected-to-decide-soon-on-fate-of-young-immigrants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/08\/28\/trump-expected-to-decide-soon-on-fate-of-young-immigrants\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump expected to decide soon on fate of young immigrants"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_109576\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-109576\" style=\"width: 3000px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/34810910902_f2bdf3954b_o.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-109576\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/34810910902_f2bdf3954b_o.jpg\" alt=\"The Trump administration faces a Sept. 5 deadline from a group of Republican state lawmakers hoping to force the president's hand.  (DoD Photo by U.S. Army Sgt. James K. McCann via Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff\/Flickr, CC BY 2.0)\" width=\"3000\" height=\"2003\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/34810910902_f2bdf3954b_o.jpg 3000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/34810910902_f2bdf3954b_o-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/34810910902_f2bdf3954b_o-768x513.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/34810910902_f2bdf3954b_o-1024x684.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 3000px) 100vw, 3000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-109576\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Trump administration faces a Sept. 5 deadline from a group of Republican state lawmakers hoping to force the president&#8217;s hand. ( <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/thejointstaff\/34810910902\/\">Photo<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/thejointstaff\/\">U.S. Army Sgt. James K. McCann via Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff\/Flickr,<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\"> CC BY 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON\u2014 After months of delays, President Donald Trump is expected to decide soon on the fate of young immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children as he faces a looming court deadline and is digging in on appeals to his base.<\/p>\n<p>Advocates on both sides of the issue are bracing for the possibility that Trump will halt the issuance of new work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program, a move that would effectively phase out a program that gave hundreds of thousands of young people a reprieve from deportation and the ability to work legally in the U.S.<\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration faces a Sept. 5 deadline from a group of Republican state lawmakers hoping to force the president&#8217;s hand. The White House, however, insisted Sunday that it had no announcement on an issue the president has openly wrestled with for months.<\/p>\n<p>The deliberations come as Trump has been under fire for his response to a white supremacists&#8217; protest in Charlottesville, Virginia. Trump further fanned the flames of racial tension Friday when he pardoned Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Arizona&#8217;s Maricopa County, who had been found guilty of defying a judge&#8217;s order to stop racially profiling Latinos. The decision drew fury from Democrats and opposition from some Republicans, but was hailed by Trump&#8217;s most fervent base.<\/p>\n<p>Trump has wavered back and forth on his plans for DACA, which he slammed during his campaign as \u201cillegal amnesty.\u201d Since taking office, however, Trump has softened his stance on the issue, at one point telling The Associated Press that the affected young immigrants could \u201crest easy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>His administration, Trump said back in April, was \u201cnot after the dreamers, we are after the criminals.\u201d All the while, the Department of Homeland Security has continued to grant two-year, renewable DACA work permits, to the dismay of\u00a0immigration\u00a0hard-liners.<\/p>\n<p>But now, Trump is under pressure to make a final call: His administration is facing a September 5 deadline set by a group of Republican state lawmakers, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The group, which successfully halted an Obama-era program that would have protected certain parents living in the country illegally, threatened to take on DACA if the administration does not rescind the order and stop issuing work permits by their deadline.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s forced him,\u201d said Roy Beck, the executive director of NumbersUSA, which advocates for lower\u00a0immigration.\u00a0\u201dInertia&#8217;s great until something gets in your way and you have to either rev up the engines to go through the barrier or just stop.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Continuing to process work permits is one thing; defending a program Trump called illegal in court is another. And many, including Trump&#8217;s chief of staff John Kelly, the former head of DHS, believe that DACA is on dubious legal footing and would not stand up in court.<\/p>\n<p>The president has several options.<\/p>\n<p>He could order DHS to halt the issuance of new DACA work permits immediately _ or at a future date _ and perhaps call on Congress to come up with a legislative fix, as, Kelly has in the past. There have been conversations among lawmakers about ways to grandfather current DACA recipients, and such a measure could become part of the horse-trading over the budget and raising the debt ceiling when Congress returns from August recess.<\/p>\n<p>The administration could also continue issuing DACA work permits, trigging the Republican court challenge, and then choose not to defend the measure in court.<\/p>\n<p>Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the anti-immigration\u00a0group Center for\u00a0Immigration\u00a0Studies, which also advocates a reduction in\u00a0immigration, said that he is in favour of allowing the affected immigrants to stay, but believes the administration should use their imperiled status as a bargaining tool to push other priorities, like new limits on legal\u00a0immigration.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy fear is, and always has been, is that they&#8217;re going to give away DACA for peanuts,\u201d he said, pointing to a deal that would only secure funding for Trump&#8217;s promised southern border wall in exchange for some sort of legal status for those covered by DACA.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat&#8217;s the only bargaining chip they really have with the Democrats,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, those who are impacted by the program have been preparing for the worst, said Sergio Garcia, an\u00a0immigration\u00a0attorney in California who has handled thousands of DACA applications<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s \u201ca lot of anxiety. A lot of people nervous, trying to figure out what&#8217;s next and what&#8217;s going to happen to them,\u201d he said, pointing to Trump&#8217;s Arpaio decision as a troubling sign.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEvery time we think there&#8217;s a line this president won&#8217;t cross, he&#8217;s crossing it,\u201d Garcia said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON\u2014 After months of delays, President Donald Trump is expected to decide soon on the fate of young immigrants who &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":109576,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,6],"tags":[14087,22138],"class_list":["post-114499","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-immigration","tag-president-donald-trump","tag-young-immigrants","mauthors-jill-colvin","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114499","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114499"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114499\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/109576"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}