{"id":110635,"date":"2017-08-08T21:52:29","date_gmt":"2017-08-09T01:52:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=110635"},"modified":"2017-08-08T21:57:33","modified_gmt":"2017-08-09T01:57:33","slug":"fired-google-engineer-files-complaint-weighs-legal-options","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/08\/08\/fired-google-engineer-files-complaint-weighs-legal-options\/","title":{"rendered":"Fired Google engineer files complaint, weighs legal options"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_110448\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-110448\" style=\"width: 272px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/272px-Google_2015_logo.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-110448\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/272px-Google_2015_logo.png\" alt=\"Google 2015 logo (Photo By Google Inc. - https:\/\/chromium.googlesource.com\/chromium\/src\/+\/master\/ui\/webui\/resources\/images\/google_logo.svg, Public Domain)\" width=\"272\" height=\"92\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-110448\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Google 2015 logo (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=42827827\">Photo By Google Inc., \u00a0Public Domain<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MENLO PARK, Calif. &#8212; A 28-year-old former Google engineer who was fired over a memo he wrote about gender differences said Tuesday he&#8217;s exploring all his legal options and has already filed a labour complaint over his treatment.<\/p>\n<p>James Damore, whose memo over the weekend caused an uproar online, said in an email that he was terminated late Monday for \u201cperpetuating gender stereotypes.\u201d He said that prior to being fired he had filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board and that \u201cit&#8217;s illegal to retaliate against a NLRB charge.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A filing by Damore with the board Monday alleged he was subjected to \u201ccoercive statements\u201d while at Google.<\/p>\n<p>A Google spokesperson said Tuesday that the company could not have retaliated because it was unaware of his labour complaint until reading about it in the media after his dismissal. As of Tuesday afternoon, the company said it had not been sent notice of the complaint by the board.<\/p>\n<p>The board declined to comment.<\/p>\n<p>Google CEO Sundar Pichai on Monday said in an email to employees that, while he supports free expression by company workers, Damore&#8217;s memo crossed the line of the company&#8217;s code of conduct \u201cby advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.\u201d Pichai added that he was cutting short a family vacation overseas to address staff in a town hall Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK,\u201d Pichai wrote.<\/p>\n<p>The engineer&#8217;s widely shared memo , titled \u201cGoogle&#8217;s Ideological Echo Chamber,\u201d criticized Google for pushing mentoring and diversity programs and for \u201calienating conservatives.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Google&#8217;s just-hired head of diversity, Danielle Brown, responded earlier with her own memo, saying that Google is \u201cunequivocal in our belief that diversity and inclusion are critical to our success.\u201d She said change is hard and \u201coften uncomfortable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Damore&#8217;s memo, originally circulated on an internal Google discussion group, begins by saying that only honest discussion will address a lack of equity. But it also asserts that women \u201cprefer jobs in social and artistic areas\u201d while more men \u201cmay like coding because it requires systemizing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The memo says biological differences between men and women may explain why women are not equally represented in the\u00a0technology\u00a0industry.<\/p>\n<p>Damore&#8217;s filing with the NLRB cites a part of the labour relations act that gives employees the right to engage in \u201cprotected concerted\u201d activities. That includes being active on social media , though it&#8217;s unclear if his memo, written on a Google Doc and submitted to an employee-only forum, qualifies for such protection. The first tweets about the post by other Google employees began Friday, though a company spokesperson said the document appeared to have been created weeks earlier.<\/p>\n<p>The Twitter hashtag #JamesDamore was drawing a storm of opinions both attacking Damore for his memo and his qualifications as an engineer, and criticizing Google for his dismissal.<\/p>\n<p>The battling messages come as Silicon Valley grapples with accusations of sexism and discrimination. Google is also in the midst of a Department of Labor investigation into whether it pays women less than men, while Uber&#8217;s CEO recently lost his job amid accusations of widespread sexual harassment and discrimination.<\/p>\n<p>Leading tech companies, including Google, Facebook and Uber, have said they are trying to improve hiring and working conditions for women. But diversity numbers are barely changing .<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Associated Press writers Matt O&#8217;Brien in Providence, Rhode Island, and Barbara Ortutay in New York contributed to this report.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MENLO PARK, Calif. &#8212; A 28-year-old former Google engineer who was fired over a memo he wrote about gender differences &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":110448,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[2533],"class_list":["post-110635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","tag-google","mauthors-ryan-nakashima","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110635\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/110448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}