{"id":110306,"date":"2017-08-07T22:26:29","date_gmt":"2017-08-08T02:26:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=110306"},"modified":"2017-08-07T22:32:29","modified_gmt":"2017-08-08T02:32:29","slug":"msnbc-surges-as-home-for-trump-opponents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/08\/07\/msnbc-surges-as-home-for-trump-opponents\/","title":{"rendered":"MSNBC surges as home for Trump opponents"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_110312\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-110312\" style=\"width: 797px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/logo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-110312\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/logo.jpg\" alt=\"MSNBC logo (Photo: msnbc\/Facebook)\" width=\"797\" height=\"797\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/logo.jpg 797w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/logo-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/logo-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/logo-768x768.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 797px) 100vw, 797px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-110312\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">MSNBC logo (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/msnbc\/photos\/a.273865226043070.58830.273864989376427\/1414682885294626\/?type=1&amp;theater\" target=\"_blank\">Photo: msnbc\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NEW YORK \u2014 For the first month since CNN&#8217;s Larry King owned cable news in October 2001, the most popular personality in prime-time doesn&#8217;t work for Fox News Channel. Rachel Maddow of MSNBC is the new champ.<\/p>\n<p>Her network achieved other milestones in July, including its closest finish to Fox since 2000 and largest margin of victory over CNN ever. The numbers illustrate a surge in popularity at MSNBC, where politics has become prime-time entertainment. Like late-night comic Stephen Colbert can attest, having President Donald Trump as a regular punching bag is great for business.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI thought there would be a lot of interest in news,\u201d said MSNBC President Phil Griffin. \u201cI had no idea this would happen.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s especially noteworthy because the year after an election traditionally signals a slump in cable news ratings. During prime-time weekday hours in July, Fox News averaged 2.36 million viewers _ still more than any other cable network, news or entertainment. MSNBC was at 2.13 million and CNN at 961,000, according to the Nielsen company.<\/p>\n<p>A wider view illustrates how things have changed. Earlier this year, Fox routinely had more viewers than MSNBC and CNN combined. Those two networks frequently duke it out for second place; last November CNN averaged 1.83 million viewers to MSNBC&#8217;s 1.64 million, Nielsen said. MSNBC took over second earlier this year and the gap continues to widen.<\/p>\n<p>MSNBC&#8217;s Maddow, Chris Hayes and Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell follow Trump with a critical eye each evening. The rapid pace of new developments, often aided by the fierce competition for scoops between The New York Times, Washington Post and other outlets, gives MSNBC a fresh helping of outrage every night for Trump critics eager to lap it up.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey&#8217;re not interested in someone looking to be impartial,\u201d said Rick Kaplan, former president of both MSNBC and CNN. \u201cThey want the same kind of red meat that a lot of conservatives wanted from Fox 10 years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Griffin believes a key to MSNBC&#8217;s success is that its hosts aren&#8217;t just spouting talking points, that their programs contain solid reporting. Maddow&#8217;s ability to make connections and tell stories is beloved by fans who want to get absorbed by the issues, even if they can be frustratingly slow for the non-believers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPeople want depth,\u201d he said. \u201cThis is a complicated time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>CNN believes that MSNBC&#8217;s success doesn&#8217;t come at its expense. The network is on pace to have its second-highest prime-time viewership since 2008 and best ever in full-day ratings, Nielsen said. CNN also is comfortably profitable, with more advertising revenue at this point in the year than ever before, the network said.<\/p>\n<p>Essentially, MSNBC&#8217;s surge is fueled by newbies, people who weren&#8217;t regular cable news viewers. So the question remains of why these people are primarily going to MSNBC instead of CNN.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CNN&#8217;s prime-time is panel-based, with a stream of people talking about the news. Unlike MSNBC, CNN regularly includes Trump supporters in the mix and some of those _ think Jeffrey Lord _ infuriate the president&#8217;s opponents. CNN&#8217;s immediate announcement that it wasn&#8217;t interested in outgoing White House press secretary Sean Spicer as a contributor was understandable given the administration&#8217;s biting attacks on the network, but Spicer is likely to be more skilled than Lord.<\/p>\n<p>While Trump has ripped CNN relentlessly, MSNBC has gotten off easily _ with the prominent exception of \u201cMorning Joe\u201d hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski. It&#8217;s hard to tell whether those attacks have undermined CNN with potential viewers, or if most people receptive to them would be watching Fox, anyway.<\/p>\n<p>Maddow&#8217;s ratings victory comes with one asterisk: she no longer has Fox&#8217;s Bill O&#8217;Reilly to compete with. O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s ouster in April after harassment charges, coupled with Megyn Kelly&#8217;s departure for NBC, leaves Sean Hannity as the one constant in Fox&#8217;s prime-time lineup. The network&#8217;s 2.36 million viewers in July compares to 3.82 million in February.<\/p>\n<p>Fox&#8217;s revamped lineup may not be as appealing. Fox&#8217;s hosts also strongly back a president who has been buffeted with bad news and is supported by one-third of the public. Time will reveal the determining factor in the network&#8217;s loss of strength.<\/p>\n<p>MSNBC recently moved to shore up a weak spot in its lineup, replacing Greta Van Susteren with Ari Melber at 6 p.m. ET. The weekend _ glutted with prison lock-up shows _ is another test. Will MSNBC&#8217;s leaders spend the money necessary for more live news programming on Saturday and Sunday to make the network more competitive then?<\/p>\n<p>Griffin, who has been with MSNBC since its 1996 launch, understands the relentlessly cyclical nature of his business enough to enjoy this run.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs someone who has been here, loves this place, believes in it,\u201d he said, \u201cI&#8217;ve never seen it like this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>___<\/p>\n<p>The story has been corrected to show that Megyn Kelly departed Fox News for NBC.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK \u2014 For the first month since CNN&#8217;s Larry King owned cable news in October 2001, the most popular &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":110312,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,106],"tags":[20620,20621,20619],"class_list":["post-110306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","category-hollywood","tag-msnbc","tag-phil-griffin","tag-rachel-maddow","mauthors-david-bauder","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110306\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/110312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}