{"id":109413,"date":"2017-08-02T02:51:09","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T06:51:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=109413"},"modified":"2017-08-02T02:51:09","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T06:51:09","slug":"lower-excise-taxes-on-sugared-beverages-salty-foods-pushed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/08\/02\/lower-excise-taxes-on-sugared-beverages-salty-foods-pushed\/","title":{"rendered":"Lower excise taxes on sugared beverages, salty foods pushed"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_109415\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-109415\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/PRA-logo.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-109415\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/PRA-logo-300x150.png\" alt=\"The Philippine Retailers Association (PRA) is pushing for lower excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and salt content of foods. (PNA photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/PRA-logo-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/PRA-logo.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-109415\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Philippine Retailers Association (PRA) is pushing for lower excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and salt content of foods. (PNA photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"background: white;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">MANILA, Aug. 2 &#8212; The Philippine Retailers Association (PRA) is pushing for lower excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and salt content of foods in both chambers of Congress, noting higher taxes can jack up prices to reduce consumer demand and sales for products.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">In an interview, PRA President Paul Santos said the two proposed measures to slap higher excise taxes on these products will have an impact on the retail business in the country.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">Under Section 150-A of House Bill 5636 or the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) Act, sugar sweetened beverages will be slapped excise tax of PHP10 per liter of volume capacity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">Santos pointed out that the imposition of PHP10 per liter tariff on sugared beverages is \u201ca bit high\u201d considering there is one country slapping a similar tax equivalent to peso value of only PHP3 per liter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">\u201cAs retailers, we will nearly pass on the excise to our consumers but we expect that the demand for sugared products will drop and (also) our sales of these products. That\u2019s because consumers will now be made to pay the excise tax,\u201d he said.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">Santos hoped that Congress will reduce the tariff to \u201csomething consumers can afford to pay.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">Meanwhile, the PRA head said the other measure pending for House of Representatives action is the so-called tax on salt content of foods, which he considered also \u201cquite high\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">House Bill No. 3719, introduced by Masbate Representative Scott Davies Lanete, proposes a tax of PHP1 per milligram of sodium in excess of one third of the allowable daily intake as prescribed by the Department of Health.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start;margin: 15.0pt 0in 15.0pt 0in\"><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: 'Helvetica','sans-serif';color: black\">\u201cIf that bill is passed as is, it will certainly reduce demand for these kinds of foods because the cost will just be too prohibitive. And for retailers, we will also be affected because our sales of these products will decrease as well,\u201d Santos added.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA, Aug. 2 &#8212; The Philippine Retailers Association (PRA) is pushing for lower excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and salt &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":109415,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[69,16,95],"tags":[20266,20268,20267],"class_list":["post-109413","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-food","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-pra","tag-salty-foods","tag-sugared-beverages","mauthors-leslie-d-venzon","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109413","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109413"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109413\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/109415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}