{"id":108775,"date":"2017-07-28T22:39:05","date_gmt":"2017-07-29T02:39:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=108775"},"modified":"2017-07-28T22:39:05","modified_gmt":"2017-07-29T02:39:05","slug":"senate-optimistic-about-finding-common-ground-to-dutertes-tax-reform-package","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/07\/28\/senate-optimistic-about-finding-common-ground-to-dutertes-tax-reform-package\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate optimistic about finding common ground to Duterte\u2019s tax reform package"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_108776\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-108776\" style=\"width: 500px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Sherwin-Gatchalian.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-108776\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Sherwin-Gatchalian.jpg\" alt=\"Gatchalian (pictured) again cited \u201ca common fear\u201d on the effect of petroleum taxes and excise taxes to the poor as a reason for the Senate\u2019s hesitation to pass the package in full. (PNA photo)\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Sherwin-Gatchalian.jpg 500w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Sherwin-Gatchalian-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-108776\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Gatchalian (pictured) again cited \u201ca common fear\u201d on the effect of petroleum taxes and excise taxes to the poor as a reason for the Senate\u2019s hesitation to pass the package in full. (PNA photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA &#8212; Senators previously expressed doubts that President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s request to pass the comprehensive tax reform package can be passed \u201cin full\u201d, but a senator said that he was hopeful that some changes can be accommodated.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m very optimistic that we will find a solution. I think that\u2019s how legislation is formed, we find a solution until we agree on a solution,\u201d Senator Sherwin Gatchalian told reporters in an interview.<\/p>\n<p>Gatchalian reiterated that while the Senate wanted to grant the President\u2019s request to help the government raise more revenue to fund infrastructure projects, passing the package in full would have several negative impacts.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it\u2019s because it is part of the policy of the administration there is a general support for this bill, but I don\u2019t think it will pass at its original intention or format. Definitely, there will be many changes to accommodate the negative effects of the tax reform,\u201d Gatchalian said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think everyone wants infrastructure, everyone wants a better life for our families and we really need revenues for that, we should also look at the impact of it all in our family\u2019s lives. We need to find a solution,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Gatchalian again cited \u201ca common fear\u201d on the effect of petroleum taxes and excise taxes to the poor as a reason for the Senate\u2019s hesitation to pass the package in full.<\/p>\n<p>He also pointed out that the Department of Finance has also admitted that there are possible inflationary effects if the package would be approved.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe want to make sure that this won\u2019t burden ordinary Filipinos. I think it goes without saying that if it becomes a burden to the 100 million population then definitely there will be a political impact not only for the Senators but also for everyone who participated in this measure,\u201d the senator said.<\/p>\n<p>He, meanwhile, expressed hope that economic managers continue to give President Duterte a \u201cfull view\u201d of the comprehensive tax reform package &#8212; the up and the downside of the package.<\/p>\n<p>Aside from Gatchalian, Senator Juan Edgardo Angara has also expressed reluctance to grant the President\u2019s even after he was given a special mention during the State of the Nation Address.<\/p>\n<p>Angara, chair of the Senate Committee on Ways and Means, earlier said that he was apprehensive about how it would affect how people purchase fuel, oil, gas and diesel and sugar sweetened beverages including milk.<\/p>\n<p>He said that he was even willing to resign from his panel if his colleagues disagreed with him. However, many of his colleagues had already vowed their support.<\/p>\n<p>Senators Joseph Victor Ejercito, Panfilo Lacson, Senate President Pro-Tempore Ralph Recto also shared the same sentiment as Angara.<\/p>\n<p>The House of Representatives has already approved the first package with 246 votes that are in favor, nine that are against it, and one abstention last May 31.<\/p>\n<p>The tax-reform package seeks to lower personal income tax rates, expand the value-added tax (VAT) base, raise excise taxes on petroleum and automobiles, impose an excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages and ease the rates of estate and donor\u2019s taxes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA &#8212; Senators previously expressed doubts that President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s request to pass the comprehensive tax reform package can be &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":108776,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,1145,16,95],"tags":[11129,343,2444,3110,13683],"class_list":["post-108775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-philippine-senate","tag-philippines","tag-rodrigo-duterte","tag-sherwin-gatchalian","tag-tax-reform","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108775"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108775\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/108776"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}