{"id":108711,"date":"2017-07-28T02:24:58","date_gmt":"2017-07-28T06:24:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=108711"},"modified":"2017-07-28T02:24:58","modified_gmt":"2017-07-28T06:24:58","slug":"gop-dealt-stiff-blow-in-senates-bid-to-repeal-obamacare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/07\/28\/gop-dealt-stiff-blow-in-senates-bid-to-repeal-obamacare\/","title":{"rendered":"GOP dealt stiff blow in Senate’s bid to repeal ‘Obamacare’"},"content":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON – Dealing a serious blow to President Donald Trump’s agenda, the Senate early Friday rejected a measure to repeal parts of former President Barack Obama’s health care law after a night of high suspense in the U.S. Capitol.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unable to pass even a so-called \u201cskinny repeal,” it was unclear if Senate Republicans could advance any health bill despite seven years of promises to repeal \u201cObamacare.”<\/span><\/p>\n

A key vote to defeat the measure was cast by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who returned to the Senate this week after receiving a diagnosis of brain cancer. In an impassioned speech the day he returned, McCain had called for bipartisanship on major issues of\u00a0<\/a>national<\/span><\/b><\/em>\u00a0concern, and a return to the \u201cregular order” of legislating by committee.<\/span><\/p>\n

Three Republicans joined with all Democrats to reject the amendment, which would have repealed a mandate that most individuals get health insurance and suspended a requirement that large companies provide coverage to their employees. It would have also delayed a tax on medical devices and denied funding to Planned Parenthood for a year.<\/span><\/p>\n

The final vote was 49-51. Republicans Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine joined McCain in voting now.<\/span><\/p>\n

The amendment was a last resort for Senate Republicans to pass something -anything – to trigger negotiations with the House.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThis is clearly a disappointing moment,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. He put the health care bill on hold.<\/span><\/p>\n

Buoyed by a signal from House Speaker Paul Ryan, McConnell had introduced a pared-down health care bill late Thursday that he hoped would keep alive Republican ambitions to repeal \u201cObamacare.”<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s time to turn the page,” said Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York. \u201cWe are not celebrating. We are relieved.”<\/span><\/p>\n

McConnell, R-Ky., had called his measure the Health Care Freedom Act. It was not intended to become law, but to open a path for a House-Senate conference committee to try to work out comprehensive legislation Congress could pass and send to Trump.<\/span><\/p>\n

The measure would have repealed the unpopular Affordable Care Act requiring most people to have health insurance or risk a fine from the IRS. A similar requirement on larger employers would be suspended for eight years.<\/span><\/p>\n

Additionally it would have denied funding to Planned Parenthood for a year, and suspended for three years a tax on medical device manufacturers. States could seek waivers from consumer protections in the Obama-era law, and individuals could increase the amount they contribute to tax-sheltered health savings accounts for medical expenses.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ryan, R-Wis., seemingly opened a path for McConnell earlier Thursday evening by signalling a willingness to negotiate a more comprehensive bill with the Senate. Some Republican senators had been concerned that the House would simply pass the \u201cskinny bill” and send it to Trump. That would have sent a shock wave through health insurance markets, spiking premiums.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ryan sent senators a statement saying that if \u201cmoving forward” requires talks with the Senate, the House would be \u201cwilling” to do so. But shortly afterward, his words received varied responses from three GOP senators who’d insisted on a clear commitment from Ryan. It was not immediately clear whether the manoeuvr would succeed.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cNot sufficient,” said McCain, who returned to the Capitol Tuesday to provide a pivotal vote that allowed the Senate to begin debating the health care bill, a paramount priority for Trump and the GOP. The 80-year-old McCain had been home in Arizona trying to decide on treatment options for brain cancer.<\/span><\/p>\n

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., initially said \u201cnot yet” when asked if he was ready to vote for the scaled-back Senate bill. But later, he told reporters that Ryan had assured him and others in a phone conversation that the House would hold talks with the Senate.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI feel comfortable personally. I know Paul; he’s a man of his word,” said Graham.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cLet’s see how everything turns out here, guys,” Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., told reporters.<\/span><\/p>\n

The convoluted developments played out as a divided Senate debated legislation to repeal and replace the Obama-era law. With Democrats unanimously opposed, the slender 52-48 GOP majority was divided among itself over what it could agree to.<\/span><\/p>\n

After a comprehensive bill failed on the Senate floor, and a straight-up repeal failed too, McConnell and his top lieutenants turned toward a lowest-common-denominator solution known as \u201cskinny repeal.”<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON – Dealing a serious blow to President Donald Trump’s agenda, the Senate early Friday rejected a measure to repeal …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":108356,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,16,17],"tags":[19970,503,9869,19971],"class_list":["post-108711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","category-news","category-news-w","tag-affordable-care-act","tag-barack-obama","tag-donald-trump","tag-health-care-freedom-act","mauthors-erica-werner","mauthors-alan-fram","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108711"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108711\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/108356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}