{"id":108444,"date":"2017-07-27T02:23:02","date_gmt":"2017-07-27T06:23:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=108444"},"modified":"2017-07-27T02:23:02","modified_gmt":"2017-07-27T06:23:02","slug":"n-s-art-gallery-dealt-major-blow-as-board-rejects-bulk-of-leibovitz-collection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/07\/27\/n-s-art-gallery-dealt-major-blow-as-board-rejects-bulk-of-leibovitz-collection\/","title":{"rendered":"N.S. art gallery dealt major blow as board rejects bulk of Leibovitz collection"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"It<\/a>
It was an enormous coup for a small art gallery, scoring 2,070 photos by famed American portrait photographer Annie Leibovitz. (Photo <\/a>by Robert Scoble\/Flickr<\/a>, CC BY 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

HALIFAX \u2014 It was an enormous coup for a small art gallery, scoring 2,070 photos by famed American portrait photographer Annie Leibovitz.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the donation of the multi-million-dollar collection to the Art Gallery of Nova Scotia by a Toronto family has been mired in controversy \u2014 with allegations that the gift was a potential tax shelter \u2014 leaving the images of celebrity and pop culture icons in storage for four years.<\/span><\/p>\n

On Wednesday the Halifax gallery’s fourth and final application to have a federal board certify the photographs as \u201ccultural property\u201d of outstanding significance was rejected, casting a shadow over the prospects of the gallery holding an exhibit of the photographer’s work.<\/span><\/p>\n

A gallery spokesman said the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board has once again concluded that the bulk of the photographs did not meet the criteria for outstanding significance or national importance.<\/span><\/p>\n

Colin Stinson said the gallery is \u201cextremely disappointed\u201d and disagrees with the federal board’s decision, noting that Leibovitz is one of \u201cthe most influential photographers of her time.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe know people are eager and excited to see this very special collection,\u201d Stinson said in a statement. \u201cOur priority is still to share the work of this iconic and celebrated artist in our gallery and across the country.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

While the board certified Leibovitz’s file collection \u2014 a series of snapshots that led to final photographs \u2014 it refused to certify the large-scale exhibition-style prints.<\/span><\/p>\n

The collection includes a portrait of a naked and pregnant Demi Moore, a brooding image of the Queen, Dan Aykroyd and John Belushi as the Blues Brothers, and the haunting photo of a naked John Lennon and Yoko Ono cuddling on a floor hours before the musician was gunned down in front of his New York apartment.<\/span><\/p>\n

Stinson said the gallery’s priority is to display the photography, but without the federal certification that decision belongs to Leibovitz.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe will talk to the artist to determine the best path forward,\u201d he said.<\/span><\/p>\n

The certification is crucial for lucrative tax incentives that encourage private collectors to donate artwork to public institutions that couldn’t otherwise afford the art.<\/span><\/p>\n

Toronto art lawyer Aaron Milrad has said the works were purchased for roughly US$4.75 million but have a fair market value closer to $20 million.<\/span><\/p>\n

He said the federal board got \u201call hot and heavy about the money part\u201d and failed to recognize the spectacular magnitude of the collection.<\/span><\/p>\n

The family of Al and Faye Mintz of Toronto donated the images to the gallery in June 2013 in what was the largest single donation of one artist to the gallery.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

HALIFAX \u2014 It was an enormous coup for a small art gallery, scoring 2,070 photos by famed American portrait photographer …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":108446,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,3],"tags":[13735],"class_list":["post-108444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-art-and-culture","category-lifestyle","tag-annie-leibovitz","mauthors-brett-bundale","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108444\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/108446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}