{"id":103529,"date":"2017-05-22T19:32:24","date_gmt":"2017-05-22T23:32:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=103529"},"modified":"2017-05-22T19:32:24","modified_gmt":"2017-05-22T23:32:24","slug":"senate-panel-report-again-disproves-existence-of-davao-death-squad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/05\/22\/senate-panel-report-again-disproves-existence-of-davao-death-squad\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate panel report again disproves existence of Davao Death Squad"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Released<\/a>
Released last May 17, Senator Panfilo Lacson presented to the plenary on Monday the joint report of the Senate Committees on Justice and Human Rights; and Public Order and Dangerous Drugs, showing that “there is no proof that there is state-sponsored policy to commit killings to eradicate illegal drugs in the country” and “there is no sufficient evidence to prove that a Davao Death Squad exists.” (Photo: Philippine News Agency<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA\u2014 A Senate panel report has disproved the existence of state-sponsored killings and Davao Death Squad (DDS) vigilante group.<\/p>\n

Released last May 17, Senator Panfilo Lacson presented to the plenary on Monday the joint report of the Senate Committees on Justice and Human Rights; and Public Order and Dangerous Drugs, showing that “there is no proof that there is state-sponsored policy to commit killings to eradicate illegal drugs in the country” and “there is no sufficient evidence to prove that a Davao Death Squad exists.”<\/p>\n

The committees, chaired by Senators Richard Gordon and Lacson, respectively, conducted the inquiry last March on the existence of the so-called Davao Death Squad (DDS).<\/p>\n

It pointed out that the testimonies of both retired cop Arturo Lasca\u00f1as and self-confessed hitman Edgar Matobato were \u201cweak\u201d and \u201cdid not pass the scrutiny of the respective Committees they were presented.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe lack of credibility of both witnesses results in the lack of evidentiary value of their testimonies. Aside from the extrajudicial confession, no other piece of evidence was presented to prove the alleged conspiracy. Therefore, their confession has no probative value,\u201d the report said.<\/p>\n

Moreover, it said that the alleged conspiracy among DDS members was not properly established by independent evidence nor was it shown that the Lasca\u00f1as\u2019 statements were made while they were engaged in carrying out the conspiracy.<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026The statements were made after the conspiracy has ended and after the consummation of the crime. They were not acts or declarations made during the conspiracy’s existence,\u201d it further said.<\/p>\n

The report also recommended the amendment of the Revised Penal Code to increase the penalty for the crime of perjury, and amendment of the Rules of the Senate to punish witnesses who give inconsistent testimonies in a Senate inquiry.<\/p>\n

Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV, a staunch critic of Pres. Rodrigo Duterte, however, disagreed with the committee report saying Lasca\u00f1as’ testimony corroborated with Matobato\u2019s testimony.<\/p>\n

Last December, the two committees conducted six legislative inquiries and also reported there is no proof that a Davao Death Squad exists.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u2014 A Senate panel report has disproved the existence of state-sponsored killings and Davao Death Squad (DDS) vigilante group. Released …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":103530,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[10823,19397,19396],"class_list":["post-103529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-davao-death-squad","tag-existence","tag-senate-panel","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103529\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/103530"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}