{"id":103129,"date":"2017-05-18T23:34:31","date_gmt":"2017-05-19T03:34:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=103129"},"modified":"2017-05-18T23:34:31","modified_gmt":"2017-05-19T03:34:31","slug":"ottawa-to-review-boeing-military-bids-in-canada-after-battle-with-bombardier","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/05\/18\/ottawa-to-review-boeing-military-bids-in-canada-after-battle-with-bombardier\/","title":{"rendered":"Ottawa to review Boeing military bids in Canada after battle with Bombardier"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_99269\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-99269\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/15941168_1238722172848687_3104319475907665613_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-99269\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/15941168_1238722172848687_3104319475907665613_n.jpg\" alt=\"Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland's comment that it's \u201creviewing current military procurement that relates to Boeing\u201d appeared to be a not-so-subtle hint that the government would revisit its purchase of Super Hornets. (Photo: Chrystia Freeland\/Facebook)\" width=\"960\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/15941168_1238722172848687_3104319475907665613_n.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/15941168_1238722172848687_3104319475907665613_n-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/15941168_1238722172848687_3104319475907665613_n-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-99269\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland&#8217;s comment that it&#8217;s \u201creviewing current military procurement that relates to Boeing\u201d appeared to be a not-so-subtle hint that the government would revisit its purchase of Super Hornets. (Photo: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/freelandchrystia\/photos\/a.753841924670050.1073741853.544043002316611\/1238722172848687\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\">Chrystia Freeland\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The federal government hinted Thursday that Boeing should not take future military contracts with Canada for granted, a veiled threat that coincided with a spat between the aerospace giant and rival Bombardier.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland&#8217;s comment that it&#8217;s \u201creviewing current military procurement that relates to Boeing\u201d appeared to be a not-so-subtle hint that the government would revisit its purchase of Super Hornets.<\/p>\n<p>The government has said it plans to sole-source 18 Super Hornets as a stop-gap measure before running a full competition to replace its aging CF-18 fleet.<\/p>\n<p>The Liberals say the Super Hornets, which internal estimates suggest could cost as much as $2 billion, are urgently needed.<\/p>\n<p>Military officials and defence industry representatives contacted by The Canadian Press on Thursday were united in assuming that Freeland&#8217;s warning related to the planned Super Hornet purchase.<\/p>\n<p>Freeland&#8217;s comments came as the next potential Canada-U.S. trade dispute unfolded Thursday with the aerospace giants clashing at a Washington hearing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe U.S. market is the most open in the world, but we must take action if our rules are being broken,\u201d U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in a statement after the hearing began into Boeing&#8217;s claim that Bombardier received subsidies allowing it to sell its CSeries planes at below-market prices.<\/p>\n<p>Aerospace analyst Richard Aboulafia of the Teal Group said the Canadian government&#8217;s move was inevitable, putting into question Boeing&#8217;s strategy in taking on Bombardier.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf Boeing is smart it&#8217;ll press the do-over button and walk away,\u201d he said in an interview, adding the aeronautics powerhouse has much more to risk from losing military contracts than the tiny gain from a successful trade complaint.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBoeing values Canada as a customer and supplier-partner for both our commercial and defence businesses,\u201d said company spokesman Dan Curran.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTwo of Canada&#8217;s most recent acquisitions of Boeing military products, the C-17 Globemaster and CH-47 Chinook, were delivered on-time and\/or ahead of schedule.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In an emailed statement Boeing also pointed out that it places substantial amounts of commercial and defence work in Canada and has a supply chain that \u201cleverages the breadth and depth of the Canadian aerospace industry.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lobbyists, lawyers and aerospace executives crowded a room in Washington for a little battle playing out in the broader context of the day&#8217;s larger trade news: the U.S. announcement that NAFTA renegotiations will start in the next 90 days.<\/p>\n<p>Bombardier has made it clear that its true goal is to grab half the international market share for 100-to-150-seat aircraft, according to Boeing, which argues its rival has received an unfair head start from Canadian taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>Boeing vice-president Raymond Conner said the sale of cheap, subsidized planes to Delta Air Lines helped build momentum for Bombardier to enter a new market. If Bombardier reaches its stated goal, he said, it would squeeze Boeing from that market and cost the company US$330 million a year in annual sales.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cToday we are at a critical moment,\u201d Conner told the seven-member U.S. International Trade Commission. \u201cIf you don&#8217;t fix it now, it will be too late to do anything about it later.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Boeing has petitioned the U.S. Commerce Department and the U.S. International Trade Commission to investigate subsidies of Bombardier&#8217;s CSeries aircraft that it says have allowed the company to export planes at well below cost. A preliminary determination on the petition is expected by June 12.<\/p>\n<p>If the ITC determines there is a threat of injury to the U.S. industry, preliminary countervailing duties could be announced in July, followed in October by preliminary anti-dumping duties, unless the deadlines are extended. Final determinations are scheduled for October and December.<\/p>\n<p>Boeing is calling for countervailing duties of 79.41 per cent and anti-dumping charges of 79.82 per cent.<\/p>\n<p>It complains that Bombardier has received more than US$3 billion in government subsidies so far that have allowed it to engage in \u201cpredatory pricing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers for the U.S. aerospace giant argued Thursday that Bombardier&#8217;s own words prove it was rescued financially by multibillion-dollar assistance from the Quebec government, which last year invested US$1 billion in exchange for a 49.5 per cent stake in the CSeries. The company also shored up its finances by selling a 30 per cent stake in its railway division to pension fund manager Caisse de depot for US$1.5 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Bombardier representatives countered that their planes never competed with Boeing in a sale to Delta \u2014 which the American rival describes as a seminal moment.<\/p>\n<p>Bombardier lawyer Peter Lichtenbaum said the plaintiff is a global powerhouse that hasn&#8217;t lost any sales as a result of Bombardier, has an enviable order backlog and doesn&#8217;t even compete with Bombardier in the sales campaigns it has complained about because the CSeries is smaller than Boeing&#8217;s 737-800 and Max 8 planes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBoeing&#8217;s petition in this case is unprecedented in its overreach,\u201d he said. \u201cIf this is a case of David vs. Goliath, Boeing has cast itself in the wrong role.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Boeing&#8217;s annual sales were US$94.6 billion last year. That means the US$330 million Conner expressed concern about amounts to one-third of one per cent of its annual sales. Bombardier revenues last year were US$16.3 billion, including US$9.9 billion from aerospace activities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The federal government hinted Thursday that Boeing should not take future military contracts with Canada for granted, a veiled threat &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":99269,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,18,16],"tags":[19273,12212,13887],"class_list":["post-103129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-boeing-military","tag-chrystia-freeland","tag-federal-government","mauthors-ross-marowits-and-alexander-panetta","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103129"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103129\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/99269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}