MEXICO CITY — The future of Mexico City’s new airport, already about a third completed, comes down to a public vote this week in a political high-wire act by the country’s president-elect that could shut down Mexico’s largest infrastructure project in recent memory.
President-elect Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador promised to let the people decide the fate of the $13 billion airport designed in collaboration with celebrated architect Norman Foster. Lopez Obrador had earlier said he would cancel it if elected, his victory being a referendum in itself.
Over four days beginning Thursday, citizens will cast ballots asking whether to continue with the new airport or update Mexico City’s existing one and another airport two hours away in Toluca, while building two new runways at a military base that would be converted to commercial use.
Supporters of the new airport say it is needed because Mexico City’s Benito Juarez International Airport handles more traffic than its designed capacity and a solution is urgently needed to satisfy growing demand.
Surrounded by densely packed residential neighbourhoods, the old airport has no room to add new runways. And supporters point to a study by U.S. corporation Mitre showing that while the alternative plan is technically feasible, it presents important logistical problems and overall is unviable.
Opponents counter that not only is the new airport a potential sinkhole of corruption, but it would be an environmental disaster, threatening a decades-old effort to restore the lakes that originally covered the valley in which the capital is located. Locals also claim they were not consulted about the project.
Lopez Obrador has said he wants to remain impartial, but he and his Cabinet picks consistently make the case against the new airport, characterizing it as too expensive and a windfall for corrupt interests.
Last week, he said the second option could save $5 billion. He hasn’t said, though, what will be done with the skeletal remains of new airport if it loses. About $6 billion has already been poured into the site northeast of Mexico City.
“Corruption is over, influence is over, impunity is over,” Lopez Obrador said in a recorded message this month. “We’re going to resolve this issue in the way that best suits Mexico, the national interest, and what the people decide.”
Ivonne Acuna Murillo, a professor in the political science department at Iberoamericana University in Mexico City, said Lopez Obrador has continually said he wants to govern with and for the people. He won 53 per cent of the votes in July’s election and takes office Dec. 1.
“He understands very well where his strength lies,” she said.
Still, Acuna believes Lopez Obrador is playing a bit of a “cat and mouse” game trying to pressure Mexico’s business elite into footing the bill for the airport.
It could be working. On Tuesday, current tourism minister, Enrique de la Madrid, said on a local radio show the new airport is such a good business that it could be paid for without public funds.
On a recent morning, Lopez Obrador’s pick for transportation minister stood above an open pit mine where trucks were dumping loads of muddy sediment from the new airport site about 10 miles (16 kilometres) away.
Wearing a cream-colored cowboy hat and surrounded by residents of communities near the new airport, Javier Jimenez Espriu said he was gathering information and helping to inform citizens about the project and its impact.
His talk was interrupted by Felipe Alvarez Hernandez, a member of Peoples in Defence of the Earth Front, a group that has been fighting proposed airports in the area for nearly two decades.
“If the (vote) is going to say that it should continue, then you are violating our rights with the query,” Alvarez said, holding his machete aloft.
Jimenez asked the crowd what they wanted.
“That it’s cancelled, that’s all,” Alvarez said.
A previous attempt to build a replacement Mexico City airport in San Salvador Atenco in 2002 was cancelled due to local opposition.
In San Nicolas Tlaminca, where Alvarez was talking, residents worry the mud being dumped is toxic and will contaminate their ground water. Opponents frame the decision as: water or airport. Residents of other nearby towns say the airport project requires so much basalt and another reddish volcanic rock that mines are altering their landscape.
Alvarez and others have made it clear they will be a vocal, if small, thorn in Lopez Obrador’s side if the airport proceeds.
At the site of the new airport, work continues full-steam ahead. Construction is scheduled to wrap up toward the end of 2021.
The site was a hive of activity on a recent morning. Fifteen of the 21 massive “funnels” that will support the terminal were under construction beneath more than a dozen cranes. An army of ironworkers positioned rebar for the ground transportation centre next to the terminal.
Two floors of the control tower rise at the centre of the more than 12,000-acre site — more than six times the area covered by the capital’s existing airport.
Like much of Mexico City, the new airport is being built on an ancient lakebed. That particular area has not been home to a lake in decades, but the ground is soft and damp. Extensive site preparation was necessary to compact the ground — about 6 feet — and squeeze out the water like pressing on a sponge. Pumps run around the clock moving water to a reservoir across the highway.
“The risk of the (vote) is that the result may not reflect the level of technical decision the project deserves,” said Salvador Mora Velazquez, a political science professor at Mexico’s National Autonomous University.
Lopez Obrador has been labeled both a leftist populist and authoritarian. Letting the public decide the airport’s fate would seem to lean toward populism, but Mora sees something else at work.
“Political decisions taken through popular consultation or with the population’s opinion have a feel of legitimizing a decision already taken,” he said, adding that the way the questions are asked can steer the result.
A poll published this week by the newspaper El Financiero seemed to reflect this view. Using the official ballot question, a majority of those polled said the new airport should be cancelled. Asked another way, a majority voted to continue it.
Carlos Slim, one of the world’s richest men, is pushing the new airport. His construction company is part of the consortium building the terminal and he believes it would have a wide-ranging impact on economic development.
According to Lopez Obrador, Slim has indicated that he and others involved in the project could help lower costs and possibly finance construction without public money.
The details of that proposal have not emerged, but it could be a way for the project to continue even with a negative referendum result.
“We understand the great pressure he’s under,” Ignacio del Valle, a veteran opponent of proposed airports on the east side of Mexico City, said of Lopez Obrador. “But we won’t accept that this project is finished.”