FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. — In a heinous case on the Navajo Nation, an 11-year-old girl was lured into a van, sexually assaulted and killed. The tribe did not seek to have the man who recently admitted to killing her put to death.
American Indian tribes for decades have been able to tell federal prosecutors if they want a death sentence considered for certain crimes on their land. Nearly all have rejected that option.
Tribes and legal experts say the decision goes back to culture and tradition, past treatment of American Indians and fairness in the justice system.
“Most Indian tribes were mistreated by the United States under past federal policies, and there can be historical trauma in cases associated with the execution of Native people,” said Robert Anderson, a University of Washington law professor and a member of the Bois Forte Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe. “This allows tribes to at least decide in those narrow circumstances when there should be a federal death penalty or not.”
In the Navajo case, Ashlynne Mike’s body wasn’t found until the next day. Her death in May 2016 renewed discussions there about capital punishment.
Ashlynne’s mother has urged the tribe to opt into the death penalty, particularly for crimes that involve children. The tribe long has objected to putting people to death, saying the culture teaches against taking a human life for vengeance.
For years, Theda New Breast has seen the effects of domestic violence, drug addiction and poverty on her Blackfeet Reservation in Montana. The healer helps those who suffer from the associated trauma. But regardless of the nature of the crime, the 61-year-old is staunchly against capital punishment.
“Our beliefs, that I was raised with, say that no one has a right to take away a life except the Creator. Period,” New Breast said. “End of story.”
Congress expanded the list of death-penalty eligible crimes in the mid-1990s, allowing tribes to decide if they wanted their citizens subject to the death penalty. Legal experts say they are aware of only one tribe, the Sac and Fox Nation of Oklahoma, that has opted in.
Tribal leaders there hoped the decision would deter serious, violent crimes on the reservation in east-central Oklahoma, said Truman Carter, a Sac and Fox member, attorney and tribal prosecutor. “The tribal leaders have said yes over the years, and they left it alone,” he said.
No American Indian has been executed in any case from the Sac and Fox reservation.
Still, the ability of tribes to decide on the death penalty doesn’t completely exempt Native Americans from federal death row. According to the NAACP Legal Defence and Education Fund, Inc., 16 Native Americans have been executed since capital punishment was reinstated in 1976. The executions were for crimes occurring off tribal land or in the handful of states where the federal government does not have jurisdiction over major crimes on reservations.
That was the case earlier this year when a California jury imposed the death penalty for Cherie Rhoades. The former leader of the Cedarville Rancheria Tribe was convicted of fatally shooting four people and trying to kill two others.
Modac County District Attorney Jordan Funk said he didn’t consult with the tribe and wasn’t required to before deciding to pursue the death penalty. He said Rhoades expressed no remorse for the killings at a tribal meeting where officials were considering her eviction from the tribe.
“If they would have told me they don’t want us to execute her, I would have done it anyway,” Funk said.
Tribes also don’t have a say over the death penalty when certain federal crimes like carjacking or kidnapping resulting in death, or killing a federal officer occurs on reservation land. Those carry a possible death sentence no matter where they happen.
That’s how Lezmond Mitchell, a Navajo man, became the only American Indian now on federal death row. He was convicted in a 2001 case of killing a fellow Navajo tribal member and her 9-year-old granddaughter who were driving to see a medicine man. Their beheaded, mutilated bodies were found in a shallow grave on the reservation. Mitchell stole the woman’s car and later robbed a trading post in Red Valley, Arizona.
The Navajo Nation government objected to the death penalty on the murder charges. It had no choice on the charge of carjacking resulting in death.
Tamera Begay, a Navajo woman, has studied the Mitchell case and agrees the tribe should steer clear of the death penalty. “There’s so much federal jurisdiction, that’s worrisome,” she said.
Laura Harris, executive director of Americans for Indian Opportunity and member of the Comanche Nation, said her tribe sees banishment as a much worse punishment than death because it cuts off a person’s ability to be part of the community.
She said tribes also recall how the death penalty has been used against them. In December 1862, for example, 38 Dakota men who were at war with settlers in Minnesota were hanged in the largest mass execution in U.S. history. An annual horseback ride is held to commemorate the men, ending at the site of the hangings in what’s now Reconciliation Park.
Today, the death penalty is more likely to be carried out in the case of a white victim than a victim of colour. Native Americans make up less than one-quarter of 1 per cent of victims in cases that result in executions, according to the NAACP Legal Defence and Educational Fund. For whites, it’s 75 per cent, for blacks 15 per cent and nearly 7 per cent for Latinos.
“It’s not surprising you’d see a distrust of the judicial process similar to the distrust you see in the African American community,” said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. “When you look at who is executed, you see that there are a class a favoured victims and a class of disfavoured defendants.”
Melissa Tatum, a research professor at the University of Arizona in Tucson, said most tribes believe the criminal justice system in Indian Country doesn’t work, “not in a sufficient way that they would opt into the death penalty, and the statistics bear that out.”
Pursuing the death penalty in a federal case isn’t taken likely, said Kevin Washburn, a University of New Mexico law professor and member of the Chickasaw Nation. A U.S. Department of Justice panel has to review the case.
Tribes also can’t decide on a case-by-case basis, Washburn said.
“You can’t have a murder that happens today and have the Navajo Nation authorize the death penalty tomorrow and have it apply to the murder that happened today,” he said.
Ashlynne’s family is looking toward future change. The Navajo man who recently admitted to killing her, Tom Begaye Jr., cannot get the death penalty at his upcoming sentencing. He faces life in prison without the possibility of release under a plea agreement with federal prosecutors.
After Ashlynne’s death, Navajo leaders met with medicine people and talked for at least two hours about the tribe’s general position on the death penalty and decided to maintain a position against it, Tribal Council Speaker LoRenzo Bates said.
“Navajos see life as precious, good or bad, and so we don’t pick and choose,” he said. “All life is precious.”
Pamela Foster, Ashlynne’s mother, has been gathering signatures online to convince the tribe to change its mind.
“If traditional teachings are squarely against the taking of human life, WHY are we allowing it to happen?” Foster wrote in an online post.