1987 Constitution – Page 2 – Philippine Canadian Inquirer

3 ex-chief justices to attend Senate Cha-cha hearing

MANILA — Three former Supreme Court (SC) chief justices and a former Senate president are set to attend the Senate panel hearing on the proposed amendments...

News7 years ago

Joint voting on Cha-cha not in Constitution: Sotto

MANILA — Senate Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III on Friday said the 1987 Constitution itself does not mention that the Congress should take a joint vote on...

Headline7 years ago

2019 elections pushes through unless Constitution is amended — Palace

Malacañang clarifies on Wednesday that there will be no cancellation of 2019 midterm elections unless the 1987 Constitution is amended ahead of the schedule. During a...

Uncategorized7 years ago

Duterte’s term may be extended once federalism is approved, says Pimentel

The shift to federalism will pave the way for the extension of President Rodrigo Duterte’s six-year term to three more years as this is part of...

News7 years ago

Palace: Ending poverty best way to uphold human rights

On the observance of the International Human Rights Day, Malacañang promised a “life with higher dignity” for poor, saying the best way to uphold human rights...

Breaking8 years ago

3rd reading approval of death penalty bill violates Constitution — lawmaker MANILA, March 7 (PNA) — The scheduled third reading approval of the death penalty bill on Tuesday violates the three-day notice rule prescribed in the 1987 Constitution, an opposition lawmaker at the House of Representatives said. In a press conference on Tuesday, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman said the third and final reading on House Bill No. 4727, seeking to restore death penalty, is “premature” since it violates Section 26 (2) of Article VI of the Constitution. “No bill passed by either House shall become a law unless it has passed three readings on separate days and printed copies thereof in its final form had been distributed to its Members three days before its passage, except when the President certifies to the necessity of its immediate enactment,” the Constitution read. Lagman likewise said that the schedule of the bill’s approval is unlawful under the House rules, which provides that: “no bill or joint resolution shall become law unless it passes three readings on separate days and printed copies thereof in its final form are distributed to the Members three days before its passage”. Lagman said that the printed copies were reportedly distributed to the congressmen’s offices last Thursday and Friday, noting that such distribution was “unavailing and not compliant” with the constitutional provision. “The alleged distribution last Thursday is fatally defective because on Thursdays, Representatives are not in their respective offices because most of them go home to their respective districts for constituency work and some have appointments with government officials concerning their districts, while Fridays are non-working days in the House of Representatives,” Lagman explained. Lagman said the third and final reading of HB 4727 should be next week. “Counting the three-day rule from Monday, and pursuant to the computation that the first day is excluded while the last day is included, the third day will still be on Thursday,” Lagman said. “Consequently, the third reading is seasonable starting Friday, but Friday is not a session day,” he added.

MANILA—The scheduled third reading approval of the death penalty bill on Tuesday violates the three-day notice rule prescribed in the 1987 Constitution, an opposition lawmaker at...