US Army reverses course on discharging 1 immigrant recruit

Brazilian immigrant Lucas Calixto filed a lawsuit against the Army in late June. (Photo By United States Department of the Army – Public Domain)

The U.S. Army has reversed its decision to discharge an immigrant reservist who sued when he was booted from the military last month after enlisting with a promised path to citizenship, according to court filings and his attorney.

Brazilian immigrant Lucas Calixto filed a lawsuit against the Army in late June, saying the Defence Department hadn’t given him a chance to defend himself or appeal when he was discharged.

Calixto, who lives outside Boston and recently had been promoted to private second class, is one of dozens of immigrant recruits and reservists who immigration attorneys say have faced often unexplained military discharges and cancelled contracts.

In a court filing Monday, Justice Department attorneys said the Army decided to revoke Calixto’s discharge and expected to finalize the process by Wednesday.

“This is an important first step in returning Mr. Calixto to his Army unit, where he has been serving honourably for two years, and allowing him to complete his eight-year service commitment,” an attorney for Calixto, Douglas Baruch, said in a statement Tuesday.

The Pentagon and Justice Department declined to comment on the specific decision, citing ongoing litigation concerning the immigrant recruitment program and the need to protect national security interests.

The reversal comes as the Defence Department has attempted to strengthen security requirements for the program, through which historically immigrants vowed to risk their lives for the prospect of U.S. citizenship. The Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest program, known as MAVNI, ultimately was suspended.

“There are no individuals being either released from their contracts or separated from the military due to their immigration status,” said Pentagon spokeswoman Air Force Maj. Carla Gleason. “There are significant risks from insider threats such as espionage, terrorism, and other criminal activity across the program.”

Government attorneys called the recruitment program an “elevated security risk” in another case involving 17 foreign-born military recruits who enlisted through the program but have not been able to clear additional security requirements. Some recruits had falsified their background records and were connected to state-sponsored intelligence agencies, the court filing said.

Eligible recruits are required to have legal status in the U.S., such as a student visa, before enlisting. More than 5,000 immigrants were recruited into the program in 2016, and an estimated 10,000 are currently serving.

Nearly 110,000 members of the Armed Forces have gained citizenship by serving in the U.S. military since Sept. 11, 2001, according to the Defence Department.

Since 2013, however, more than 20 recruits to the MAVNI program had become the subjects of counterintelligence or criminal investigations by the Defence Department or FBI, according to the court filing.

Gleason could not say how many of those recruits had been charged with or convicted of crimes, nor did she provide details as to how such figures compared to those for U.S.-citizen service members.

As of April, 1,100 MAVNI recruits were awaiting basic training while undergoing security reviews, and Gleason said that based on historical estimates, about one-third of the group would not pass and likely would be discharged or have their contracts cancelled.

Some recruits say they were given no reason for their recent discharges. Others said the Army informed them they’d been labeled as security risks because they have relatives abroad or because the Defence Department had not completed background checks on them. Many were reservists who had been attending unit drills, receiving pay and undergoing training, immigration attorneys said.

The Pentagon has said there has been no policy change since last year, when Defence Secretary Jim Mattis said no one could ship out to basic training without completion of a background investigation.

This week, a Chinese recruit who said he was told his contract was being cancelled in March said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials came to his home in Rochester, New York, and told him for the first time that his legal status in the United States had ended in June and that he was being placed into deportation proceedings.

Recruit Zhang, who gave only his last name for fear that his family could face reprisals in China if he was known as a former U.S. Army enlistee, said he and his wife were issued ankle monitoring bracelets Monday and ordered to appear in immigration court at the end of August. ICE officials said in a statement that Zhang had been charged with immigration violations and ICE enrolled him in the agency’s Alternatives for Detention program “in an exercise of discretion.”

Gleason and an Army spokeswoman declined to comment on the Zhang case.

“Me and my wife came to the U.S. because we wanted to be good immigrants, and we thought the program was a great fit,” said Zhang, who has a business management degree and had been pursuing a masters. “I am very depressed right now, and it is hard to make a good plan for the future.”