Connect with us

Headline

Marcos camp asked to clarify magnifying glass incident

Published

on

Former Senator Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. and Vice President Maria Leonor 'Leni' Robredo. (Photo courtesy: Bongbong Marcos Facebook page and Office of the Vice President via PNA)

In an urgent ex-parte motion, Robredo, through her lawyer Romulo Macalintal, raised that Nestor Borromeo, one of Marcos’s revisors, used a plastic magnifying lens on June 14 when papers are the only items allowed in the area (Photo courtesy: Bongbong Marcos Facebook page and Office of the Vice President via PNA)

MANILA — The camp of Vice President Leni Robredo filed on Friday a motion before the Supreme Court (SC), sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET), to direct the lawyer of ex-senator Ferdinand “Bong Bong” Marcos Jr. to name the persons who knew that their revisor brought a prohibited item in the recount area.

In an urgent ex-parte motion, Robredo, through her lawyer Romulo Macalintal, raised that Nestor Borromeo, one of Marcos’ revisors, used a plastic magnifying lens on June 14 when papers are the only items allowed in the area.

Macalintal said after their camp informed the PET about the incident, Rodriguez issued a statement to the media stressing that other people on the revision floor were aware of the plastic magnifier being used in the area and they never complained.

“Plainly speaking, these persons, fully aware that the use of magnifying lens is prohibited, allowed Mr. Borromeo to not only bring the said item inside the revision area but worse, use it as well,” he added.

Macalintal noted that as a lawyer and officer of the court, Rodriguez has the responsibility to inform the PET about the identity of the “other people” aware of the incident.

Macalintal added that Rodriguez’s cooperation on the matter will dispel any wrong information being fed to the media and the public in connection with Marcos’ protest.

Marcos is yet to comment on this issue because of the gag order pending his electoral protest against Robredo.

On June 26, PET in Case no. 0005 Marcos vs. Robredo fined both camps and counsels PHP50,000 each for violation of sub judice rule. (With reports from Christopher Lloyd Caliwan/PNA)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Lifestyle3 weeks ago

We Are The Sum Of Our Choices

Most people tell me I’m lucky. No, darlings. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LUCK. I worked hard for most...

Lifestyle2 months ago

Never Settle For Less Than You Are

Before I became a mother, before I became a wife, before I became a business partner to my husband, I...

Lifestyle2 months ago

Celebrating My Womanhood

The month of March is all about celebrating women and what better way to celebrate it than by enjoying and...

Lifestyle3 months ago

Maria’s Funny Valentine With An Ex!

Maria in Vancouver can’t help but wonder: when will she ever flip her negative thoughts to positive thoughts when it...

Lifestyle3 months ago

The Tea on Vancouver’s Dating Scene

Before Maria in Vancouver met The Last One seven years ago and even long before she eventually married him (three...

Lifestyle4 months ago

How I Got My Groove Back

Life is not life if it’s just plain sailing! Real life is all about the ups and downs and most...

Lifestyle4 months ago

Upgrade Your Life in 2025

It’s a brand new year and a wonderful opportunity to become a brand new you! The word upgrade can mean...

Maria in Vancouver5 months ago

Fantabulous Christmas Party Ideas

It’s that special and merry time of the year when you get to have a wonderful excuse to celebrate amongst...

Lifestyle5 months ago

How To Do Christmas & Hanukkah This Year

Christmas 2024 is literally just around the corner! Here in Vancouver, we just finished celebrating Taylor Swift’s last leg of...

Lifestyle6 months ago

Nobody Wants This…IRL (In Real Life)

Just like everyone else who’s binged on Netflix series, “Nobody Wants This” — a romcom about a newly single rabbi...